CreateDebate


Debate Info

4
15
Yes. They have to No. They don't have to
Debate Score:19
Arguments:11
Total Votes:25
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Yes. They have to (4)
 
 No. They don't have to (7)

Debate Creator

kwon(7) pic



parent have to stay together for their children wellbings

What do you think it is right? I think Yes.

 

Yes. They have to

Side Score: 4
VS.

No. They don't have to

Side Score: 15
1 point

Because, when they divorce, children will be very sad. And they can grow very bad and when they are adult, they can follow that situation.

Side: Yes. They have to
3 points

But if they stay together and let the children watch them fight, they will follow that too.

Side: No. They don't have to
1 point

Because when parent divorce, children can be violence because they divorce.

Side: Yes. They have to
1 point

When Mom/Dad go away like me, my dad go away. ( No divorce ) So I'am very sad. So children can be sad.

Side: Yes. They have to
0 points

When dad or mother go away like walk two moon book, children will find he/she's parent. And they will boring

Side: Yes. They have to
Atrag(5666) Disputed
3 points

Are you using google translate or something? This made no sense whatsoever.

Side: No. They don't have to

Lol. I must be dyslexic. I read ''Parent have to stay together for their weblings'' .. I was like ''whuuuut da fuck'' ?

But no, they should not. Children can easily feel a bad tension between their parents, and if their forced to face that everyday it will ruin them. If there is anything worse than having divorced parents, then it's having parents that live together but fight with each other often.

Side: No. They don't have to

That's what my parents try to do. It was terrible. All the arguing that was going on put me on edge. I like my silence, but I hardly had any with the BS going on.

Side: No. They don't have to
1 point

To a degree, yes. Parents should try to do everything they can to save and better their marriage, but at some point, it's usually better to divorce than continue to fight and remain unhappy in front of your children.

Side: No. They don't have to
1 point

They should but as some people have already stated, if you are a drunk maniac going around abusing your children and wife, no. There are many more reasons why too.

Side: No. They don't have to
0 points

Some pretty simple examples can easily refute this idea.

1) A family lives quite well, but the father is a bit of a drunk and is kind of violent - the mother is a saint. Some day the father gets home with blood all over his cloths, and he tells his wife that he has killed somebody. Should the mother stay together with the father for the wellbeing of the kids?

2) What about a mother who is mentally ill, constantly hits the children and the husband? There's no end to the suffering she is bringing into the home. Should the father stay together with the mother for the wellbeing of the kids?

3) Neither the father nor the mother cares too much about each or the kids. They secretly have other partners, and the kids are left to take care of themselves most of the time. When the parents are physically present they aren't really on an emotional level. Everyone in the house would like to live under different circumstances, so should the parents stay together for the wellbeing of the kids?

To all of these cases I suspect people will give a strict 'no', unless they are too tied up in their morale dogma.

Side: No. They don't have to