Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Alexandra1
| Reward Points: | 1 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 1 |
| Debates: | 0 |
I think that the contenintal theory is most accurate because of many reasons. My first reason is that the plates could most likely not drift so far in such a short amount of time. Also even though the crust is the thinnest layer of the earth. It is still quite deep compared to the perspective of humans. Therfore I don't think it would make sense for Pangea to split apart so face in the short time of 40 days. Also I think that the continents would be moving so fast that the middle could possibly concave and that obviously did not happen . Also I do see how Pangea could break apart and move about 2 centimeters due to the seaquakes which could be more likely to happen.
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
