Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Audrey
| Reward Points: | 1 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 1 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Both of these theories could probably not be proven while we are still alive, but if I had to choose one it would have to be the continental drift theory. I think that the continental drift theory is more believable and has a few things I'd like to point out like the fact that the flood theory could probably not happen again. So if the continents move over time and scientists start to see it then that theory could be proven (if the continental drift theory is true it will be more likely to be proven). I think this theory is true because the earth is moving and the ocean is also moving which helps move the rock cycle. So because the rock cycle is happening it gives this theory more proof. So in conclusion I think that there is more proof on the continental drift theory. That is my argument on this matter.
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
