CreateDebate



Welcome to CreateDebate!

CreateDebate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Claudia0314

Reward Points:2
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
100%
Arguments:2
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
2 most recent arguments.
2 points

I think it was the continental drift because I read that the continental drift broke it apart. I don't think it was flood because there would have been more land before all the continents formed for a flood to have happened. At one time all the continents were together called the Pangaea and that had to move to create our 7 continents now, there was a problem with the magnetic force of the mantle said scientist and that made it separate (the continental drift). Scientist also said that at one time when it was in continental drift two continents bumped into each other and created another continent. If that is true then there couldn't have been a flood because there would have only been 6 continents.Also scientist said that if there was a flood then all of land that we are on now would have been mountains because the part of the Earth that didn't go under had to be tall.

1 point

I think that Pluto shouldn't be qualified as a planet because the qualifications for a planet is that it has to be large, it needs to orbit around the sun, and it has to have a fairly round shape. The planet Pluto has a sort of oval shape to it and it is very small. Pluto is also considered a dwarf planet which doesn't qualify for a planet. Claudia C. Period 4

Claudia0314 has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here