Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 2 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 1 |
Debates: | 1 |
nowadays welfare emerge on the hot issue. some people say the government should give money to poor. because even if they are poor, they are citizen. but I disagree that government has duty to their citizen. There are a few reasons why i opposite. First, it is not reasonable. Second, it is not efficient.
First of all, the most important reason in support of my claim is that it interrupt the motivation of hard workers. most people feel a sense of accomplishment when they earn the money. they try to make much money. it became a impetus of society developing. if government give money to the poor, people who work hard don't wanna do their work. they feel dont need to work. becasue if they don't earn money , governmnet is going to suppose them. This phenomenon make society worse.
Second, It is difficult to find out the poor. Usually many people decieve administration to avoid tax. Unless government discriminate the poor, it will loss not only budget but meaningful of welfare. also, some people misuse this system. Additionaly, they should pay for discriminator. it makes many expense.
For these reason, i am in the opposit of debate
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |