What is consider to be good or bad? Who knows this difference? Our government also composed of humans, as we are and this politicians are not perfect and not the ultimate truth. Maybe site, which contain some information about political opposition or prohibited religious movement also might be considered as a site with improper content and banned?

You want come back to Middle Ages where everything were controlled by King and Pope? Personally, I don't.

It is matter of parents rather than government. Also, parents are able to use special programs, which put some restrictions on the list of side which your or your children cannot access, but not government. We are talking about government intervention into our private life and retrieving private information from the Internet.

I stand against Internet censorship provided by government because it would be limitation of freedom of the speech and oppression of the human rights.

Controlling Internet could help government to limit teenagers' access to unsupervised resources, where anyone can read information about occult sacrifices and repeat ceremony. But unfortunately, government would control not only occult movement's resources but also any kind of social networks, e-mails and so on and so forth just to" find potential danger" and this actions are considered to be more like invasion of privacy and it's unseasonable for modern society.

As you know, almost in each story Robots outsmart this 3 Laws of Robotics. In 'I, Robot' collection of the stories, Asimov wrote about how AI consider itself as much smarter than human and started to control space station and barely destroyed mankind by it's actions ('Reason' story).

Asimov create fundamental principles of Robotics but in his short stories he pointed out that AI was able to outsmart this 3 Laws.

We should not be too selfish. And possibility of AI's self-evolution is high because scientists want to give them [AI] consciousness without mentioning one fact: no-one, except humans of course, doesn't have such as an important instrument of mankind's evolution - conscious intelligence.

Yes, violence is illogical action but unfortunately lots of people suffer from violence. Why? Violence is illogical action but at the same time it's prevalence emotions and feeling over conscious and for me singularity is equal to having feelings and emotions. Moreover, today's military forces would try to use it in military purposes http://library.thinkquest.org/18242/app_military.shtml

And this fact automatically leads to invasive actions with helps of AI.

What is more, AI could consider that all humans actions is illogical and it might try to control mankind. Because of that we would be limited not by over Human-Government but by AI creatures and only because our motivations usually illogical.

But the consequences of this evident are unpredictable. Yes it could solve all our problems but it could provide new and more serious problems and nuclear power plans is the best example of it. From one hand it doesn't pollute atmosphere but in any emergency cases this nuclear power plants could easily destroy huge surrounding area. The same could happened with AI. From one hand - it's best servant for us, from another - dreadful weapon with enormous capabilities and strength.

Still, when you create something you create it by yourself. Maybe someone give you a brilliant idea but your work is yours and you won't be happy if in a 10 or 20 or 50 years someone would just take your work, redesign it and receive profit from selling originally YOUR IDEAS and YOUR BOOKS (than why Apple took Samsung to court? Samsung didn't do anything bad. They just provided 'a fresh eye on iPad'... Frankly, your point of view sound like this).

And taking original text and adding some zombies, pamper, demons and so on and so forth... Dont's you think that it'll be much more creative to wright something new and really fresh? Maybe new bestseller but based on your thoughts ans ideas.

Speaking about fan-fiction... Fans creating stories but they don't sell it as a consequence they don't receive any profit but authors of mashup books do...

Put limitation on it. Great idea! Bit don't you think that all conscious creature want to be free? We are conscious and we want liberty and freedom so why you think AI won't want the same? And this limitation on AI creatures could lead to rebellion as it is happened with slaves in North America in 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries. And now, try to guess who will win we or machine? Just for example: take into account how fast you could run and how fast car goes and you'll see who is stronger...

'Artificial Intelligence Is Lost the Woods' Yale University professor's essay and he insist on necessity and incapability to create AI.

http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/18867/