You must be joking. Ben Shapiro would destroy Cenk Uygur in a debate. In fact, if we're talking an actual debate with opposing ideas ie: a real conversation, and not just a popularity contest, most people would beat Cenk Uygur. For all you far leftists, I would love to see you point out a recent Cenk Uygur debate where he done anything more than attack the character of his opposition. He does nothing but play identity politics in every debate I've seen him in, rarely ever making any kind of real point. While on the other hand, Ben Shapiro uses facts and logic to shred opposing arguments to bits, never letting his emotion or popularity dictate his arguments. Whether or not we can actually attribute the following quote to Teddy Roosevelt is debatable, but the quote itself remains as true as ever: "to anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." Cenk Uygur uses his audience (trained seals) to win his debate for him, and I'll give it to him, its effective. But it is intellectually dishonest, and he doesn't care in the slightest. I would love to see this debate. I'd pay a hefty sum to do so. But let's make this absolutely clear: Cenk Uygur would never in his "right" mind do something so silly as to challenge Ben Shapiro to a debate, it won't happen. He knows just as well as I know, or Ben knows or anybody else who's not suckling social justice from the overweight, body positive, over confident, self indulgent, hysterical feminist, left loving liberal teet knows, that he would be bowing down to Ben Shapiro before the end of the night. Would Cenk Uygur lose the debate? Of coouurrssse!

Excuse the double post, I was attempting to respond to liberal gentleperson......

You must be joking. Ben Shapiro would destroy Cenk Uygur in a debate. In fact, if we're talking an actual debate with opposing ideas ie: a real conversation, and not just a popularity contest, most people would beat Cenk Uygur. For all you far leftists, I would love to see you point out a recent Cenk Uygur debate where he done anything more than attack the character of his opposition. He does nothing but play identity politics in every debate I've seen him in, rarely ever making any kind of real point. While on the other hand, Ben Shapiro uses facts and logic to shred opposing arguments to bits, never letting his emotion or popularity dictate his arguments. Whether or not we can actually attribute the following quote to Teddy Roosevelt is debatable, but the quote itself remains as true as ever: "to anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth." Cenk Uygur uses his audience (trained seals) to win his debate for him, and I'll give it to him, its effective. But it is intellectually dishonest, and he doesn't care in the slightest. I would love to see this debate. I'd pay a hefty sum to do so. But let's make this absolutely clear: Cenk Uygur would never in his "right" mind do something so silly as to challenge Ben Shapiro to a debate, it won't happen. He knows just as well as I know, or Ben knows or anybody else who's not suckling social justice from the overweight, body positive, over confident, self indulgent, hysterical feminist, left loving liberal teet knows, that he would be bowing down to Ben Shapiro before the end of the night. Would Cenk Uygur lose the debate? Of coouurrssse!