Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 0 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 56% |
Arguments: | 6 |
Debates: | 0 |
Correct, however, in the long run, the country ends up worse than before. Thus, the country tried to help but in the end, made it worse.
Loans in the long run is more beneficial for the lender than the borrower due to interests, the country will end up paying more than it borrowed. Therefore, the foreign power is not truly trying to help the local country.
Foreign aids does not necessarily help the country, the countries give loans, not grants. If they truly wish to help, they would not expect anything in return.
This argument is one sided, it only considers the view point of the suffering country.
The foreign aid might have ulterior motives.
Chan claims that the gender revolution is largely unrecognised and unacknowledged. This means the gender revolution is present in our society, people do not pay attention to it. I agree with Chan as it is evident that the gender revolution is prevalent in this world. However, it has not received as much attention as other doomsday revolution which has not happened. This shows that even if the gender revolution is occurring, it has received lesser recognition as compared to predicted end-of-world revolution as these revolutions are more interesting and appealing to the masses as people have not experienced these revolutions. Thus this proves the
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |