In soccer, you don't have as many rules, so it is easier and more fun to play.

They shouldn't be prohibited because they can help save lives. For instance, if someone has hereditary cancer, they should be able to genetically modify that person, so they and/or their children won't have cancer. this technology could potentially save lives, so I don't think that it should be prohibited.

They didn't, if you want to see my evidence, check out this link!

Yes, the both of these peoples have been refugees at one time, and I feel like that kind of evens everything out.

I agree I don't think that it is fair that the Jew get the land because they had a really really sad story (even though it is really really terrible). The UN should have thought of something else to make it sound a little more reasonable.

Once again that claim is based on religion... Think about the Hindu's, would they think that this is a reliable claim. Since they don't believe in that religion, they might think that it is not based on anything.

I'm also wondering that, why did they leave? Can somebody please answer that?

I also agree, because if your country is in the middle of a desert, you might not do so well.

So should I get YOUR Chromebook, just because I fought you for it (hypothetically)?

For instance, I could say that God gave me your sweatshirt and that I should have the ability to take it. This isn't a very good reason for me to take your sweatshirt.

The palisteins might want different rules the Israelites, based on their religion, so it might be good for them to have a lot of the land, and have their own rules

Israel is the one who left, and Palistein are the ones who stayed.

Since the Ottoman empire was mostly Muslim, and they ruled the area for so long, with success, it might be a good idea to have the Muslims rule the area again.

Yeah, the Jewish people wanted somewhere that they could have refuge in.

I could also argue that the land belongs to the Christians because of the crusades. I think that people need to have physical evidence that the land belongs to them, and I don't think that it should be religious either.

The Jews could have fled to somewhere else, and the British could have given them a different part of land than the Palestinians.

I have a question for you, how/ when were they forced to leave?

But then couldn't the Arabs argue the same thing? I mean, it might not be written down anywhere, but they could still say it.

The Jews should get the western half because they have settlements there.

I agree, and I think that they should be split down the middle (vertically), because the bottom half of the country is a desert.

I think that the two countries should be one, with two states inside of it. They could have Jerusalem as their shared capital, and have capitals of their own. This way, they could have two different governments in each state, and different laws in each, similar to the U.S. They could both have the same currency and regulations, so it would be easier to go to one place to another. They could also have one big governing body that controls the entire country.

The Palestinians have been pretty much kicked out of their country, so just for that, they should get some land.

The Arabs have other places to go since Israel is surrounded by Arab/Muslim countries.

Israel has a few more holy sites then the Arabs, so they should have it.