In soccer, you don't have as many rules, so it is easier and more fun to play.

They shouldn't be prohibited because they can help save lives. For instance, if someone has hereditary cancer, they should be able to genetically modify that person, so they and/or their children won't have cancer. this technology could potentially save lives, so I don't think that it should be prohibited.

They didn't, if you want to see my evidence, check out this link!

Yes, the both of these peoples have been refugees at one time, and I feel like that kind of evens everything out.

I agree I don't think that it is fair that the Jew get the land because they had a really really sad story (even though it is really really terrible). The UN should have thought of something else to make it sound a little more reasonable.

Once again that claim is based on religion... Think about the Hindu's, would they think that this is a reliable claim. Since they don't believe in that religion, they might think that it is not based on anything.

I'm also wondering that, why did they leave? Can somebody please answer that?

I also agree, because if your country is in the middle of a desert, you might not do so well.

So should I get YOUR Chromebook, just because I fought you for it (hypothetically)?

For instance, I could say that God gave me your sweatshirt and that I should have the ability to take it. This isn't a very good reason for me to take your sweatshirt.