you spend all day having debates with your own alt accounts.
We both know who spends more time doing that. Some of your alt accounts are on the weekly leaderboard.
I was consistently present throughout all of our exchanges and you were not.
Actually I was there reading all of it.
DNA is a form of biological matter and a code is not the same thing as a pattern.
See what I mean? This is miscommunication on the grounds of terminology and semantics. What I said was fundamentally correct, you just disagree with the terminology being employed. The genetic code is both a pattern and a set of mathematical instructions, it is the pattern of the mathematical instructions that makes up the code.Codes and patterns are not the same thing but codes are very often based on patterns.
Nothing you said about Mathfan is true, you just had a couple little disagreements and now you are acting like he is Hitler's nephew. The way I see it the three of us are obviously the only intelligent people here, we are all slightly narcissistic and obnoxious (us moreso than him, look at all our alt account insanity) and we should get over ourselves and start creating more reasonable dialogue around here.
You clearly don't understand what you're talking about, so why don't you just stfu? Go talk to another one of your alternate personalities, you schizophrenic fuck bag.
I clearly do understand what I'm talking about, go ahead and explain to me how a code is a physical object?
@Nomenclature
I know you where allies, you used to call him "brother" and he was literally on your allies list remember? You said "I pretty much agree with everything you say brother" remember? And the DNA debate is just another example of what I said before, the whole fucking thing just comes down to miscommunication if you really think about it. The genetic code is just a pattern of DNA sequences, it isn't actually something tangible in and of itself like DNA which is the actual physical molecule which creates the genetic code. Yet at the same time DNA in and of itself is not the genetic code, because the code is the pattern created by the molecule. You are both wrong and you are both right because the whole argument was over semantics and terminology.
Jet ChemTrails.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
it is absurd to think they were directly behind them and/or orchestrated them.
Because the US dollar isn't backed by anything so in order for it to have value to other countries the US created the "petrodollar" https://www.investopedia.com/articles/
Major oil producing countries in the middle east like afghanistan and Iran refused to accept the petrodollar( because they knew they would be enslaved to the US fiat currency and the multinational banking cartels) so the US created a pretense to invade and exploit the resources of these countries.
It's funny how I'm the one sharing and your fat walrus ass is probably sitting there eating sandwiches in front of starving children. So much for christian charity, you eat enough to feed a million starving african kids judging by the looks of ya.
All people are not created equal in a literal sense, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't have equal rights or opportunities in society. Because when people are ass raped by society instead of having equal rights and opportunities as well as access to proper nutrition and education then they become even less equal because that reduces their IQ and general fitness. And that basically creates a dysgenic effect which is the opposite of what you want.
@xMathFanx/Nomenclature
Actually we are all saying the exact same thing right now. Mathfan isn't trying to provide reasons to hate Nomenclature or think he is a communist, he is pointing out that we have already all come to the conclusion that there is a massive overlap between RBE and communism (and democratic socialism as well) and that true Marxism is nothing like Stalinist/Maoist etc. brands of communism. I really don't think we should be enemies, the three of us are much more on the same page than any of us where willing to admit or realize.I think we are the only people on this site who can move beyond what Mathfan calls "the mammalian snowglobe of bullshit".
In the past I have noticed that many of your major disagreements are due to a failure to communicate. For example when Mathfan comes out with a debate such as "Bigfoot is real" he is not literally saying that he believes bigfoot is real, but Nomenclature takes it literally and attacks him for it. Or another example would be the argument about fascism, Mathfan was using it as a blanket term for despotism , Whereas Nomenclature has a very specific idea of what fascism is.
