CreateDebate


Markmcd9929's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Markmcd9929's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

Oh yeah let California and Florida go, there are too many Hispanics there anyway

1 point

Start your own religion, and just make up stuff to back it up

1 point

i am ISTP- i dont get what that means, but whatever. i am

1 point

i must not be smart enough for this site- i have absolutely no idea what any of these things mean

1 point

i cant link it for some reason, but i am 7 squares to the right and 6 squares up

1 point

Well, its not hard when you write 900 arguments, you can just go on all day!!! However, I would be impressed if you had 600 arguments. I have 42 points on 29 arguments.

1 point

And probably most important of all, they harm the economy.

1 point

No, I do not. But here's another thing to remember: this country was founded on the believe that people have the right to make their own decisions. And the welfare programs' money comes from taxes. Taxes are paid by people. And if people do not want to support poor people, then why should they not have that choice? Maybe the taxes should stay the same for them, but why should the money not be put into a deserving thing, like the army(I know it seems like I'm obsessed with that, but bear with me), or the debt?

1 point

Wel, yes. Single parents aren't lazy, but most people on it are, if not go join the army!

2 points

How are they a necessity!?!?!? I don't see that at all!!!

1 point

Yes, definitely!!! There are lazy people on these programs who don't even try to get jobs!!! And if they are truly so desperate, join the army!!!

0 points

I think he won, and I agree with capitalism more than socialism.

3 points

no, we were fine with gettting taxed, they were taxing us for no reason, and we got no representation in exchange

3 points

It is good. If there is no taxation, there is no:

-army

-cops

-any kind of public workers

-roads

-hospitals

-schools

-jail for convicts

without taxes, you dont have society. you're like the germanic tribes, just wandering around, looting and pillaging and whoever is hurt dies, whoever want something gets it, there is no order.

1 point

OK, at first I would assume it a prank. But after that, Yes I would convert. If I didn't, I would go to hell when I died, and I would obviously rather convert than go to hell.

1 point

i do not know what you mean by reveal. i dont understand then question

1 point

No i'm just saying that its funny the answer choices are yes and no on a thing about whether dogs or cats are better. i like dogs better though

1 point

It is something you want to avoid, but the world needs it. Better food/technology is needed for a place that has 7 billion people. That is more important than preserving nature

1 point

Do you prefer cats or dogs? Yes. Yes I do. No, but I like dos better

1 point

I like reeces, if it counts, because of the way it melts in you mouth. if not that, then crunch

1 point

Idk what your talking about with telling you you're on the website because of god, but there was no biblical reference that said there was an issue with homosexuality

2 points

Christianity is not a death cult, Gehovis witnesses are, but not ordinary Christians

2 points

I agree: the Bible has no opinion on homosexuality. I am saying that most people believe homosexuality is not encouraged by the Bible. Just as most people believed blacks' skin was inferior for some reason. Both are misnomers, and if you have no logical reason for discrimination, than it IS rascism

1 point

thats the point im trying to make, that their is not a valid reason for this either

1 point

Exactly, its a misnomer, similar to the misnomer of blacks being inferior due to skin color. Everybody believes it then and now

1 point

Exactly. Its a misnomer, just as it was a misnomer that blacks were inferior for their skin color. People believed it in both cases

1 point

Perhaps, but in the civil rights movement, people discriminated against blacks due to their skin and the believe that they didn't follow the law. Now, people discriminate against gays because it is against the Bible. I'm sure people viewed the arguments against blacks as reasonable, just as they view today's arguments against gays as reasonable

1 point

I do not agree. There is no need for new workers, really. Yes, they are untapped, but there is no need for them to be tapped, since if they were needed they wouldn't be unemployed!!!

1 point

Yes it does. If you are invading a place, and you win, yes it does. Its a bad thing to do, but yes it does

1 point

Laptops are overall better: USB ports, better word processing, you can have more than one window open, you can put in Cd's, but I suppose the iPad is better as a web surfing device solely

2 points

Definitely no!!! Yes, guns help kill people, but one of the things stated in the constitution was the right to bear arms, and you cannot go back on it!!!

1 point

Abortion should be allowed. What if a teenager gets pregnant, or a child is the product of rape?

3 points

Ah, yes, but guns give people the power to kill other people

0 points

No, there should not be entitlements. If people have worked hard, they can support themselves, if not then they deserve what comes. There are more important things to put the money in, like fixing the debt

1 point

Yes, it is. Civilization is where you have a high level of science, math, calendar, etc. Without morality, you have no desire to create any of these things, and you instead have a bunch of people living in villages, like the Germanic tribes, simply invading and looting. You have no desire for a better future, so yes, civilization is based on morality.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]