If you don't think of Christianity as a meme complex (or as you say "compilation") I wish you would have made that clear when I typed "you do recognize Christianity as meme complex don't you?" When you talk about "Christianity- the religion- as a whole" aren't you thinking of a group of people who identify as Christian, and a type of ideology that they share?

The picture I placed on was a meme compilation. To see the image, click on the link I provided in an argument below. That's the meme compilation I'm talking about. Actual memes.

So you think "Christianity" hasn't discarded and rewritten scriptures? Do you think "Christians" don't pick and choose what scriptures to include in their canon? If not who BUT Christians are responsible for Christianity's canonization process? Don't you realize that many Christians almost completely disregard large portions of whatever particular canon you are referring to as "the bible"?

I just intend to say that disregarding and altering scriptures is a shameless way to cover up their own disagreement in their flawed ideologies. That is why Christianity shouldn't even be considered a religion, as it is not directly influenced by God, but made up by man.

To the contrary, were Christians to seriously recognize that it is their role to prayerfully determine what scriptures are included in their canons, and through rigorous apologetic dialog, continually exercised that role, it would seem to me that this auditing process could very well serve to subject the contents of these collections to deeper and deeper logical scrutiny and thereby improve (not destroy) Christianity.

On what line of trust would these Chrisitians follow upon? They are already timidly stepping around the rotted corpse of their 'religion'. The religion would seem improved in the mind of ignorance, but in the plain of Logic, it would be stared down with shame for calling itself a religion.

Not every sect of Christianity accepts the doctrine of biblical infallibility. Plenty of Christians understand the bible as man's imperfect attempt at describing god.

Well, it amazes me why they still call themselves Christian. Being a Christian is defined as believing the doctrines, and following the practices that Christians do. They might as well be Agnostic, as them calling themselves Christian is devoid of logic. They might as well discard the bible as another piece of ancient literature, instead of no longer worshiping it while calling themselves worshipers of Jesus Christ.

There are sects such as Mormons that view scriptural revelation as an ongoing process as opposed to a completed work. There is no reason that these sects couldn't end up as the majority, if they aren't already.

Take a look at America. And their religious shows. And their defending of the Nation under God. And their attending of Churches, and their praying. Praying is also considered a required thing to be Christian. Also baptism.

And why 'Christian', when they don't believe in 'Christian'.

Then you must admit that there are serious differences of belief within Christianity as a whole.

The main meaning of Christianity is worshiping and believing in the Christian God and Jesus, also attending Church, believing in the scriptures and communicating with God by praying Christian prayers. When that is excluded, they are not Christians. They do not take part of the beliefs of the majority that attend Church and love God and all.

Really what sect?

Catholicism. I was such a deep believer, so was everyone else in my area.

There is no bibliocentric religion (regardless of whether it is supposed as man made or divinely inspired) that didn't at one point make use of fallible human decision making to determine what scriptures to include in or exclude from their canon.

True. It's a shame that a majority of religious don't see how destructive it can be from what they believe.

How would recognizing that church decision making (particularly in regards to what scriptures are canonized) is fallible, since all those involved in the process of canonization are human and fallible, eliminate the word of god?

Actual Christians who practice being actual Christians believe the bible is the word of God. From actual God. As it says so in the bible. Altering scriptures makes it no longer the intent of God, but of humans. That's all?

I don't really understand what you are getting at here but....As it stands there is already disagreement within Christianity about what books are legitimately part of "the bible". If you pay attention, you will notice that it is common practice for Christians to heavily favor certain sections of their collection and almost totally disregard other sections.

I see that. But choosing to disregard chunks of the scripture is really a brazen act of ignorance upon their own flawed beliefs.

Most Christians do not believe that god speaks only through the bible. Most Christians believe in continued revelation.

What is continued revelation?