CreateDebate


Debate Info

4
4
Agree Disagree
Debate Score:8
Arguments:7
Total Votes:10
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Agree (4)
 
 Disagree (3)

Debate Creator

BurritoLunch(6566) pic



Do You Agree Or Disagree With Intellectual Property Laws?

Agree

Side Score: 4
VS.

Disagree

Side Score: 4
1 point

Intellectual property law deals with the rules for securing and enforcing legal rights to inventions, designs, and artistic works. Just as the law protects ownership of personal property and real estate, so too does it protect the exclusive control of intangible assets.

Intangible asset

An intangible asset is an asset that lacks physical substance and usually is very hard to evaluate. It includes patents, copyrights, franchises, goodwill, trademarks, and trade names, and the general interpretation also includes software and other intangible computer based assets.

Why is the Troll upset ??????????????

Side: Agree

Ideally, credit would be given where credit is due, and there would be no need for a law. Plus no one forms ideas in a vacuum, almost every new idea is based on someone else's "intellectual property".

Side: Disagree
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

Intellectual Property Laws are tied to Private Property in what way there in the UK ????

Side: Agree
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

What do you think your Butt Lunch buddy has to say about that ?????????????

Side: Agree

Ideally, credit would be given where credit is due, and there would be no need for a law. Plus no one forms ideas in a vacuum, almost every new idea is based on someone else's "intellectual property".

Exactly, bro. For me it is just a matter of practicality. You can't control the proliferation of ideas, which is what intellectual property laws essentially amount to assuming. It isn't the same as something physical like a car or a house that you can point to and say you own. Once information is out there, you can't control how it spreads, nor do I think you should even be allowed to. It doesn't matter if it is considered art (i.e. films, paintings, games etc...) because there is literally no point in creating new forms of information if nobody experiences them. True artists aren't in it for the money; they just want people to hear/see their shit. And they should be, because that's the entire point of art in the first place. Capitalism just hijacks everything and tries to make money from it.

Side: Disagree
outlaw60(15368) Disputed
1 point

The general interpretation also includes software and other intangible computer based assets.

Where did the software in the Brit Troll's computer come from ? An intangible source ???

Side: Agree
1 point

Intellectual Property Rights in UK Law. There are several different forms of intellectual property rights available in the United Kingdom, each with its own formality, level of protection, and duration period. ... The protection afforded by copyright is to prevent others from duplicating the protected work.Mar 7, 2017

Troll no Intellectual Property Rights in UK that pertain to private property ??????????

Side: Disagree