As I understand it, the FBI's job is to investigate and recommend charges if they believe someone has done something illegal, rather than actually to convict anybody themselves. I was under the impression that a jury decides whether or not to convict, based on the evidence

A year and a few months in. Still waiting for them to recommend charges on Trump. Libs tell us he colluded. They have no evidence but believe it. They must be collusion theists, eh Nom?

In any case, can you explain exactly which crimes you have convicted Hillary of?

Nothing. Despite unsermountable evidence to the point that no one even denies that she had an illegal email server or that she destroyed devices requested by the FBI.

Also, forgive me, but your post here seems to suggest that you accept Trump has committed treason. Is that the case? Or is it merely bad wording?

Or I'm mocking libs because the FBI can't even seal an open and shut case, much less one with no evidence of any kind.

Finally, what do either Hillary or Cruz have to do with the matter of Trump's (alleged) collusion with the Russian state?

Ah. You've become one of those crazy people you tell us about who doesn't need evidence to believe...