Is violence an appropriate way to eradicate Terrorism?
Yes
Side Score: 8
|
 |
No
Side Score: 8
|
|
|
|
|
While violence doesn't eliminate terrorist ideals, it's the only way to eliminate terrorists. We must eradicate terrorists while creating proper ways to eradicate terrorism. It's a cancer that must be taken out by the source. Kill terrorist leaders; reeducate the citizens. it's the only way. Side: yes
Yes! Holy F*ing St yes! Retarded people (terrorists) don't understand talking and cooperation. They only understand violence! You can only show your superiority as the alpha male through violence! Not talking, not finding mutual ground, only through cold, heartless violence can people make an understanding. The one who comes out on top will triumph and the other will acknowledge the new alpha and submit. Right now terrorists are challenging our dominance, so we fight back with violence, a language they will understand, and we take back out alpha-male status! Side: yes
1
point
|
This is a hard ass question. Violence only begets more violence even though sometimes it is needed. However the problem with terrorism is that it's based on hatred, anger, frustration, ignorance etc. and people who feel like that are used as pawns to cause even more hatred, anger etc. etc. So if you go to Pakistan and start bombing people.. people will just use that to say their homeland is being attacked, not the terrorists there. No matter how effectively the terrorists get eliminated, without killing civilians etc. they will continue to thrive elsewhere and you can't go to war with every single country suspected of having a large terrorist population. With that said it's their mentalities you have to change... they have to feel welcomed and not underthreat, they cannot be given an excuse to terrorise. The problem with today is they're feeling more and more secluded while at the same time told to mix. You don't actually have to give them anything (as that would justify terrorism), but you can make them feel they're being given a lot. When Obama became president I know a lot of muslims thought it would mean a fresh start, Americans had turned another leaf and were willing to hear him out. Side: No
Moderate Muslims, maybe. But Radical Muslims hate Obama just as much as they hate Bush. 1. They see him as a traitor to their people (with a muslim name, they see him as a muslim traitor) 2. They're angered by the ideal that America can be diverse. They try to get used to the idea that we're the White Devil, so when we have a black president with a muslim name, it makes them think we're belittling them. Side: yes
|
