CreateDebate


Debate Info

3
1
yes it is better No it is not
Debate Score:4
Arguments:7
Total Votes:4
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 yes it is better (3)
 
 No it is not (1)

Debate Creator

mellyal_(5) pic



It is better to strike first when you think your enemy might attack

yes it is better

Side Score: 3
VS.

No it is not

Side Score: 1

If he or she is showing hostility, then yes. For your own safety you must strike first. If you give them the chance to strike it could cost you your life.

Side: yes it is better
Intangible(4934) Clarified
1 point

Pow! Right in the kisser!

Side: yes it is better
Intangible(4934) Clarified
1 point

Pow! Right in the kisser!

Side: yes it is better
1 point

I agree. Take out your enemy before they hurt you. It is better to act like a bitch than be treated like one.

Side: yes it is better
1 point

Yes hit first questions later always the safest option , running ain't a bad one either ... If your quick

Side: yes it is better
1 point

No, just because someone 'might' cause harm, it doesn't mean they will. We can't punish someone before they do something wrong. It's just like that really well known saying. "Innocent until proven guilty." And they'd obviously be innocent if they haven't done anything yet.

Side: No it is not