It might as well be. People will lie about their age to view pornography regardless of what it actually is.

Today's kids really don't seem to notice the term 'legal age' in regards to almost anything, and pornography is a big one in this case. The assessment of risk vs. harm in terms of child exposure to pornography has continued to tilt from right to left as years go on, and more and more parents are finding themselves less concerned about the modern day Internet's level of exposure to children.

A ban, in my opinion, isn't going to draw a dramatic concern from too many sources. Naturally there'll be your ethnic and religious groups, and probably a few in relation to departments of education and child protection, but it's important to remember that the child's perspective and reaction is the most important.

Why is it even illegal for people under a certain age? They might get corrupted and get the idea that people actually have sex, we wouldn't want that happening, children being aware of their own sexuality.

Why should we even have an age limit,and allow sexually complete animation doing multiple things in animation and not just sex. Howbeit sex does occur in nature, and humans are always seeing it in many forms.Therefore why even have a separation of age.The separation of age causes the porn to be only sex,and that is one dimensional,and not multidimensional like the movie Balto or Narnia movies could be a carbon copy, but still have all the furry animation be sexually complete,and still do the same things,and not necessarily have sex. Howbeit it would not be bad if there was a sex scene.