CreateDebate


Debate Info

Debate Score:3
Arguments:7
Total Votes:3
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 The United Nations Organisation is a toothless lion (3)

Debate Creator

sumra(10) pic



The United Nations Organisation is a toothless lion

Add New Argument
1 point

If your saying the UN has no real policing force or jurisdiction I would point out two things. First, the security council, the smallest body of the UN, consisting of only France, Russia, China, the UK, and the US pretty much dictate what incidents the UN condemns and who they condemn, and since they are usually the nations in question they take no action against themselves or hold themselves to the same standards they impose on other countries. Secondly, the UN is responsable for the enforcement of most organized sanctions against nations, so they have the power to impose embargos, seize a countries foreign assets and a host of other methods to "fuck shit up." This economic leverage is just as effective at sending the troops in. If you don't like how a country is acting just cut off the foreign aid and food exports and quite literally starve them out. Famines have actually been caused this way, so I think venomous snake is more accurate than toothless lion.

i like the way you metioned more of a poisionus snake and i agree that the un is most of the counrties that were on teh winning side during ww2 and; or have severe money to throw aroun d such as china seeing as how japan was basically kicking the shit out of them during the war

sumra(10) Clarified
1 point

dont u think the united nations has acted as a bindind force for the nations of the world?

sumra(10) Clarified
1 point

dont u think the united nations has acted as a binding force for the nations of the world?

YouDontKnow(79) Clarified
1 point

Its more of a tyranny of a majority if anything, that or vindication for hostile actions against a neutral power with opposing ideologies