We should disarm every citizen, create bubbles to insulate everyone. While we are at it we should get rid of automobiles (35k deaths, 2.3 million i jured, 1600 kids dead).

The born with clothes argument is silly. Clithes is a tool to protect you from elements and to protect others from loosing their eyesight.

Hell no, nobody wants to see my fat body naked not even me. People are generally unatractive naked. If ever there was an argument against free speech it is public nudity. Hate the thought of someone being forces to eat at a restraunt sitting next to my unclothed body.

Dogs are loving animals who enrich your life. Cats are animals who live to be served. If a dog is sitting next to you it is because they want your love and affection and want to return that to you. If a cat is sitting next to you its because they want your body heat, food, or attention. Cats dont really care about ypu or what you want.

It seems more and more today, people believe that those whose opinion they do not agree with want to limit what they say and insist they shouldnt be llowed to express it. We see this in the creation of "safe spaces" which are public areas that limit what others can say because some particular members will be offended. This is creating a culture/belief that people shouldnt be allowed to express opinions no matter how offensive they are while in public. This stifling is leading to heard mentality where people follow blindly others without critically thinking about the issue. Take for instance climate change. While I personally believe the climate is changing and that humans have contributed to the change, I dont feel the scientific community has been free to debate the issue and properly challenge the accepted hypothesis. This leads to decisions that are not well thought out.

Exactly. Until he becomes the president and actully implements some policy who knows if he is good or bad.

The first amendment protects both the right to practice a religion and the right to be free of religion. The question posed is does it protect the right to practice atheism. If you are an atheist you do not practice a non-belief, you simply do not believe in a "higher being". So while the first amendment protects your right to believe, it doesnt protect your right to "practice" because as an athiest you are not practicing anything.