You sir clearly have no idea what atheism is, but i assure there is no worshiping anyone, there simply obectivity and speculation.

No sir it is not faith it is a default position. You don't need any faith to reject a claim which has no empirical evidence to support itself.

Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.

We Evolved from a single cell organism to this stage, before that all i can say is i don't know yet. More research is needed to answer this question. Now with that said it doesn't mean if we don't know an answer to a question it is just to make up stories and fabricate your own groundless answers.

...So you are believing in something just because you were intimidated by their process of mass, well sir you clearly got one logical argument there. Yup that makes perfect sense.(sarcasm)

"How is this a rebuttal?"

Okay i'll explain in simpler words for you.

first you say

"Your logic of the origin of the universe is that nothing created something. Which we know by various laws of science is not the case for instance the law of cause and effect (all causes trace back to a first cause)."

The you say

"God has no creator, He is eternal. You can't apply the natural sciences to the supernatural."

That is a logical fallacy of self exclusion, it is almost childish that you even made that fallacy.

"Can you prove He doesn't exist? Didn't think so."

I have presented you with logical arguments, yet you refuse to even consider them and just tell me stories from a book, which has been conveniently re-written multiple times, meanings of things have changed multiple times. I mean seriously i wonder if you live in a bubble or something. At this point im actually feeling bad for you, for you don't know what it is like to experience freedom.

"You have yet to make an intelligent remark."

just telling you, you aren't making any real points, while my cuzin has used mathematics and studies in logic to make some plausible arguments.

"So are you denying the historical fact of the crimes these regimes committed? If so you might want monitor what you say for fear of confirming your lack of brain power to function as a sea sponge."

Nope i am not denying it, did you seem me say "oh that didn't happen??".

"The books were written by the next generation and secretaries of the Apostles. And He is risen not dead, you will have to find His body to prove otherwise."

This is exactly why i feel like you have the IQ of a peanut, There is no body that doesn't mean he is risen you fool, it means he was never there to begin with. And its just a fairy tale.

"How is this a rebuttal with no statement to contradict me? Maybe you should just limit yourself to Twitter, since you are speaking from opinion not verifiable statements."

Again, i already proved the bible is a fairytale, but you just can't accept it. Just because over 2 billion people read it doesn't make it true. You see any religion based on harry potter?

"When did we speak of this? You are bringing up the actions of men, not the word of God."

Again, you fail to understand simple things im implying. A God should stop these actions, a God should protect the victims. And not worry about the "sin" because in the end you say he loves everyone, but he lets them go through these brutal events and experience so much suffering and for what? to test there faith? If that is the case then God can easily be confused with the Devil.

"Is that why you don't wear a shirt, and shave your chest? I could see why you would reject such an obvious homosexual religion."

I don't see why this remark is needed but hey w/e helps you feel secure about your religion. And what i do and don't do with my body is only my concern.

"No, by definition you have to deny God to be an atheist. So therefore you would deny any evidence of His existence. That is not reasonable."

Lol clearly you don't understand atheists. We deny God because we have yet to see any evidence of his/her existence. And Again i feel like a broken record and i don't know why you can't get this through your head but, BIBLE IS NOT A SOURCE THATS PROVES ANYTHING, IT CAN'T BE USED TO SUPPORT ANY ARGUMENT. IT IS MERELY A STORY BOOK.

"Alone a sperm has no potential for life. I already said this to you." That was a typo sperm & egg* have the probability to meet

"Those cells have the ability to be a human life. When conception occurs you must give life a chance. It is murder to cease that life."

It is not a life until it can process some thought, can be aware of it's surroundings, or at least until it has the shape similar to a human From that point i agree its murder, But before that it is nothing but a blob of cells.

"You have not supported any of your conjecture. You are merely stating your opinion.

If sperm could make a life on it's own, then you would have babies crawling all over you chin."

SEE above

ALSO I find it very interesting that you didn't even acknowladge my source that i provided i will paste it again

http://www.google.com/search?q=Religious+wats&btnG;=Google+Search&hl;=en#q=Religious+wars&hl;=en&prmd;=ivnsub&tbs;=tl:1&tbo;=u&ei;=5JgtTZylPI-t8AaHm8XNCQ&sa;=X&oi;=timeline_result&ct;=title&resnum;=14&ved;=0CJQBEOcCMA0&fp;=a20cfd04ba3c5cf9

I hope your eyes don't miss it. but again you seem like you are blinded so lets see what happens.

EDIT-

I see that link is directing to the search result but not the link im trying to jump at, so im gonna write down this process

Search on google -> "Religious Wars"

Scroll down and you will see, "Timeline results of religious wars" that has 2000 years of history of religious wars.

EDIT

"Is a 58 percent chance that an atheist leader will murder a noticeable percentage of the population over which he rules sufficient evidence that atheism does, in fact, provide a systematic influence to do bad things? If that is not deemed to be conclusive, how about the fact that the average atheist crime against humanity is 18.3 million percent worse than the very worst depredation committed by Christians, even though atheists have had less than one-twentieth the number of opportunities with which to commit them. If one considers the statistically significant size of the historical atheist set and contrasts it with the fact that not one in a thousand religious leaders have committed similarly large-scale atrocities, it is impossible to conclude otherwise, even if we do not yet understand exactly why this should be the case. Once might be an accident, even twice could be coincidence, but fifty-two incidents in ninety years reeks of causation!""

That sir is a groundless statement, yes Stalin murdered. But thats the only guy you in the history who was an atheist and a ruler who murdered.

Rest Are Part of a religion and murdered in the name of a religion, many including your religion and many other religions.

"God has no creator, He is eternal. You can't apply the natural sciences to the supernatural."

You sir are just giving a new meaning to the word stupidity.

"We are to humble ourselves before God. It's because He is the Almighty Creator that you must humble yourself out of respect. Those who do not fear (respect and humble themselves) God will be arrogant and sinful in all aspects of their life."

You are just brainwashed aren't you. You can't even see how twisted it is to be humble because you fear a magical being in the sky. Seriously its like hitting your head against a wall, when debating a religious fanatic like you.

And don't get me wrong there are somewhat plausible arguments for your side, my cuzin who is a mathematics major and Christian presents me those but you sir are just stupid.

" http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism#Atheism_and_Mass_Murder" LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You say my sources aren't credible but you present me with that? It is a well known fact that this website is nothing more than a propaganda site. LOL!!!! it's got "conserv" in its name gee i wonder what its all about. Comon you really can't be that naive? You do know its a site created mainly for republicans and christinans.

And here is a more proper source to show you the reality of the amount of damage religion has done, not just in the last century but the last 2 millenniums

http://www.google.com/search?q=Religious+wats&btnG;=Google+Search&hl;=en#q=Religious+wars&hl;=en&prmd;=ivnsb&tbs;=tl:1&tbo;=u&ei;=Yx0mTen4CYSdlgfU5ISzAQ&sa;=X&oi;=timeline_result&ct;=title&resnum;=13&ved;=0CI4BEOcCMAw&fp;=1&cad;=b

"You prove you are uneducated here, you imply the Bible is a fairytale yet you have no way to prove or disprove it. Such claims are based on conjecture, and further prove your ignorance. That and of course you don't cite any sources for your theories (conjecture without evidence)."

Do you keep up with the world? Or do you play mental gymnastics to make yourself believ that you are right even though it has been proven you aren't.

It has been proven that everything written about Jesus was written about 20-30 years AFTER he died. There is no direct source confirming his existence, so clearly it was a fairytale (sure a popular one, but a fairytale none the less).

"Let me stop you right there, since the point flew way over that tiny brain of yours. You can't claim 'your ethics' when they all descend from religious law. Morals of not murdering and stealing date back to pre-Mesopotamian era."

Oh i see thats why people were burned alive in witch hunts and killed because they didn't follow the "true christian god" right got you.

"You can't claim 'your ethics' when they all descend from religious law. Morals of not murdering and stealing date back to pre-Mesopotamian era. That is before secular historians claim we formed settlements and became sedentary. So then it must mean these morals are 'wired' in us."

And yes my ethics, My religion was Sikhism and it does teach morals but again i was a kid so i didn't bother reading them. I simply learned, I was sad when i saw someone being hurt or crying it was as simple as that. I hated seeing people unhappy. Therefore i don't do things that makes a person's life miserable and unhappy.

"You contradict your beliefs here. Doesn't the atheist agenda say it's not human until its born."

Atheist agenda is to be reasonable, and EVERY ATHEIST IS NOT THE SAME. And i believe after 12 weeks the baby develops the structure that resembles a human being therefore now it is some what human like semi-human if you will, so at this point i would say its wrong. But before that it is up to the mother to decide. Not up to you or anybody, the mother and mother alone.

And other atheists may believe differently but again they have their reasons. As long as i have a proper argument to support my opinion it is acceptable. We do not have law that we have to follow in atheism.

" Sperm alone and an egg alone doesn't have the potential for life. A fertilized egg does have the potential for life. If it can become a living breathing human, then it's murder to cease this process."

Actually yes every sperm has the potential to be a life, if they were to meet. again a fertilized egg is just that a a fertilized eg which rapidly multiplies itself into many cells but they remain cells, They are not aware of themselves like we are, they are just cells.

"I think an important step for pro-choice people to take, is to demonstrate abortions on themselves. Since it's not murder it won't be suicide. Just call it an 'abortion' right?"

Again your stupidity has no limits, a human being walking around aware of it's surroundings is much different than a blob of cells that aren't aware of anything at all.

I find it interesting you continue to site bible as a source, and a website where the article is written by professional writers isn't a credible source.

A wise man once said The difference between intelligence and stupidity is that intelligence has limits.

"This site has no evidence, just rambling conjecture and opinions of atheists"

If you had bothered to read something you would have seen those are logically structured arguments that do not use opinion but Reasoning to produce a answer.

And just because an atheist is presenting an argument doesn't mean its rambling.

"The Protestant does not have any 'strict traditions' or follow blindly without question. "

...you are kidding right?

" As a follower you do fear God, it is this way so you stay humble as a person. "

So You are only a humble person because of fear, if you don't see whats wrong with that, then you are just foolish.

" So therefore they justify their immoral acts like abortion (murder of unborn child), drugs, stealing, murder, rape. All of these things would be just fine for an atheist to do. Because he has no rules. Our ethical principles as a society derive from religious doctrine."

You could not be more wrong, you see any atheist running into a building blowing themselves up? you see any atheist molesting a child? (yes im talking about the priests). Now i believe you are confusing atheists with psychopaths but since you aren't educated i guess you don't know what that is.

But here is how my ethics and morals work. IF somebody hits me, rapes me, steals from me then I don't feel too happy about it, therefore i know it is also wrong to do it to others i DO NOT need a book or a god scaring me into not doing something.

As for abortion, It is only a human life after 12 weeks before that it is just a bunch of cells. It is like saying you want to save every sperm cell and every egg because it maybe a child one day. But again i don't know if you understand what i just said since you are clearly uneducated.

"I have shown you that you do follow rules. Common sense is only 'common' if it's shared by a group of people. Therefore your perception of morality is based on religious law. If you could do whatever you want then steal a car. You can simply say "No, I would get arrested", or because you know it's wrong (religious law). If you have no problem stealing a car then you are amoral. Therefore lacking morals by society's definition (based on religious law). "

See above

"Your logic of the origin of the universe is that nothing created something. Which we know by various laws of science is not the case for instance the law of cause and effect (all causes trace back to a first cause)."

No sir i do not know what caused the big bang, but i certainly don't rely on fairy tales to answer that question. (And please don't put words in my mouth, i know it maybe hard for someone like you but try not to delude yourself)

And this can back fire on you. If something can't be created from nothing, then who created your god?

I don't think you fully understand what he is trying to say, Atheism is opposite of what religion is.

Religion

-Strict rules

-Strict traditions

-holy book for morality

-limitations on what you can and can't do (so much for free will)

-Must follow blindly without questioning

-Followers are controlled with fear of eternal punishment, or punishment of some sort for thinking freely

Atheism

-No Rules

-You Make your own traditions, up to you.

-Common sense and basic reasoning skills for morality.

-Do w/e you want

-Questioning is encouraged.

-Atheism uses nothing to control anything, simply uses logic to help people understand the reality.

That is what it is to me at least, I certainly don't speak for the atheist population.