Without science, math would be a good mind exercise but it is meaningful when applied.

You should also consider that people in poverty are more likely to be found guilty since they can't afford a good lawyer.

Our prejudice from what we hear is also has effect on it. Someone recommends you a movie, if it really bad, you search for the good sides of it to justify yourself that it was a good movie.

Results from a study in 2007 can guide your question. See the link.

Original article title: Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse

A simple note by the way.

These two things aren't same: rejecting the existence of god and believing that there isn't god.

Looking at the advancement that humanity been through, i say yes we will.

From Aristotle to Weinberg, we solved so many puzzles. We are stepping towards answers (though there are many problems present).

It seems this development is going to continue: at some point, we will get a formula sheet.

I don't believe, but i used to. I came to a point that i should choose one: rationality or dedication. I chose the former. Because i could quantitatively observe, explain and experience the life without god. So the idea of god seemed an unnecessary assumption.

The real question, in my opinion, should be: Is the concept of god can be reduced to a scientific level? But i guess it is an irrelevant topic for this debate :)