Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 2 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 2 |
Debates: | 0 |
NOPE...... we talk about life here... and fetus don't have a life... they don't have heart.. and they don't even have any brain to think( in young age of pregnancy i mean..), whether they agree to eliminate by someone or not..( yeah, human right..)
so... i bring new proposal in this case.. ABORTION IS KILLING AN INNOCENT LIFE WHEN ABORTION TRANSPIRE IN OLD AGE OF PREGNANCY... AND ABORTION IS JUSTIFIABLE IN YOUNG AGE OF PREGNANCY..
any rebuttal?
of course not!! let me define the "real" abortion...
Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo.....
so... we just "remove" something unnecessary (well, although it will be a human nine months later..)
and then the word that we should discuss from this motion is "life"...
and embryo is not yet become a human which have a life...
embryo, still a part of pregnant woman , which synchronize by "placenta".... when we do abortion, we just remove that part..
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |