CreateDebate


Atticus104's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Atticus104's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

I use to be on here a long time ago, like a decade. It was not super great back then, but looking at it now I think he quality is dropping. I get the impression there are a lot of fake accounts. I wonder who is who from the old days here.

4 points

Yeah, pretty much the only argument needed here.

0 points

The queen and trump were not fans of each other, and given Trump's usual MO is to be as attention seeking as possible, it would not be unexpected for him to cause a scene while there. Plus, if he really wanted to, I am sure he could pay his own ticket. But who knows, maybe he can't leave town with the ongoing criminal investigation.

1 point

I work on an ambulance. On an interstate, I might go 79, but I don't break 80. Also, when I am driving with my lights and sirens, cars should not be trying to pass me or race.

1 point

I think you probably should have added more accurate titles for each stance.

I am all for more police accountability. I think there is a lot of stuff that is brushed aside until a spotlight is added. Still, I think this is an important law to have. There needs to be a reasonable buffer for suits against law enforcement. This is not to say an absolute immunity buffer that prevents all lawsuits, far from that. It just needs to be enough to prevent officers from being hamstrung with a bunch of frivolous lawsuits.

1 point

No, because historically this goes bad. There is even less accountability with vigilantes than law enforcement and a greater risk of the biased practice. Think of the KKK and other white supremacist terrorist groups that acted carried out what they deemed as vigilante justice to suppress the vote of black Americans.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]