CreateDebate


HidekiTojo's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of HidekiTojo's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

I recognized. I just love Science Fiction, and I felt like I Should say something. I haven't been on the website for the longest of time.

1 point

Stormtroopers are horrible in the field of ballistics. So I would not start off by saying that.

HidekiTojo(149) Clarified
1 point

Comrade, you mean "infinite"power .He was saying that neither side has or has had evdence, and that all we can hold onto is our personal belief. Religious debates always go to the deep, I feel like theist should not have to debate to prove their beliefs. If they were truly inclined in their God or Gods, they should not have to debate. But, if they insist.

1 point

He is a very funny man. Though, i think he should actually put up useful facts and information, he could then actually be a contributer to this website.

1 point

Either side was right, but the Confederates got the wrong end of the stick. This wasnt a war on slavery, it was about states' rights and money. Schools when i grew up taught the Confederates were all evil people, lies.

1 point

I never said it wasn't...Yes, Britain did not go to war, when I was talking about factions playing cards I was talking how discombobulated slave owners and The West Africa Squadron play roles.

1 point

I didn't say Britain went to war. The West Africa Squadron captured many slaves ships and liberated the slaves aboard.

1 point

They look under 18 to me, at-least some of them. Much like how you are rating "Hotness".

1 point

He was born to Cuban parents making him, Cuban. Cuba is a part of Latin America, although not associated with South America.

1 point

That in no way supports your topic, or maybe you like little children. Yes, you are giving us a link of diverse little children in a debate on "Hotness", pedo much?

1 point

Not all of them. Armando Perez is Cuban. You should know that, since you are using him as a thumbnail.

1 point

Ha-ha, comrade. You have made me смеяться (laugh) many times over.

2 points

First of all, you are imbecilic....You are disrespecting these ethnicities by giving them "names", which are unjust. Your "brown" people, can be categorized as different ethnicities such as Cuban, Indonesians, and Vietnamese. This isn't a debate, it's demeaning and putrid.

1 point

Britain abolished slavery without war, and there were factions that played cards. Any groups that are fighting over political/economic/social fueds are factions. Rebellions can be fully formed, sponsered , and raised.

1 point

Yes, they did not. But, they did. The south wasn't idustrialized like the north, less mechanized. So, they used slaves to make up for not being mechanized.

1 point

And the federal taxes. They felt like the federal government should not control and decide their ways of life. After the north depended on their south's cotton production.

1 point

Nope. More so on the unfair taxes placed on the south by the federal states.

1 point

It's nice to know another fellow Communist agrees with me. But the best we could do is ignore them for now. After all, there is no "punish" button we could all push to bann an entire debate thread.

1 point

A large majority of Confederates never owned a slave in their lives.

-1 points

" I am not now, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social or political equality for the Negro and White races", Abraham Lincoln's speech to the people of Charleston, South Carolina.

1 point

" If I could save the Union without freeing a single slave I would do it, if I could save it by freeing all slaves I would do it, if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would do it." That being said he only issued the Emancipation Proclamation for the well-being of his government. In fact,Union Generals in southern territories freed the slaves in those areas. Also, Lincoln denied the Emancipation twice.

1 point

It's happened to me and is still going. Though now I am used to it.

1 point

Excuse me,but isn't that apart of atheist reasoning? Forgive me if I'm wrong. No one really has a sense of "bad" at first, the that's when we grow older. God told specifically told Adam and Eve not to eat the fruit from the tree. You keep bringing up "fairness" are you an atheist because of bad experience? Many convicts are raped and physically harmed in other ways in prison, you see many of them establishing their own churches and services, many others don't ,and you're comparing god to a parent, if you've learned anything from theist you will have learned God isn't an average parent.

1 point

Yes, and don't forget his drone program killing thousands of innocent women, and children at every strike. The government states "the drones make American safer", from what? Unarmed civilians? Assumed terrorist? Alleged combatants? U.S. authorities have largely kept quiet on the subject of drone strikes in Pakistan. Obama has already authorized 283 strikes in Pakistan, six times more than the number during President George W. Bush's eight years in office. As a result, the number of estimated deaths from the Obama administration's drone strikes is more than four times what it was during the Bush administration -- somewhere between 1,494 and 2,618.

1 point

Obama is a hypocrite. He kids are just as important as the average American's kids, after all we are "One Nation" as what the allegiance states. If he is protecting his kids now from potential dangers, how dangerous do you think it will get when he takes away gun rights? Unfortunately worse.

1 point

Yes, the senario is fair. Adam and Eve were persuaded by the devil to eat the fruit, it was still their choice to follow him. God lets evil things reign over us for us to turn to him (still a choice.) One question though,you say you reject God because there is no evidence for him: he's invisible and mysterious. But you believe intrinsic moral values and intrinsic moral rights, for which there is no evidence, and which are also mysterious and invisible. I don't understand. Could you explain why you reject God but accept the existence of intrinsic moral values?

1 point

Not now if thats to any interest. North Korea is weak because it carelessly spews all of it's secrets, hell! China is even annoyed with them.

1 point

Yes, but God said not to eat from the tree, you didn't incorporate that. We all start off innocent, free of sin. But then, later in life we sin like it's nothing, (in your case it wouldn't be anything.) Life isn't fair, God doesn't have to be fair, he may not reward you in your actual life, but surely in after-life.

1 point

As far as i am concerned, i am on the ground. I do not care about his access to information, just about his argument himself, don't be a worry wart.

1 point

He was a tyrant. The south wanted to be left alone and just that. A lot of other nations abolished slavery peacefully, without Civil Warfare, and a lot of people are missing the fact that a LARGE majority of Southerners never owned slaves in their lives.

1 point

It resembled the first sin, if he stopped it, they would not be considered free, God doesn't make you believe him, he lets you choose.Though God wants us to fix our sins, he lets you commit them over and over.

1 point

He did nothing, he gave them a choice to enslave or not to enslave. If he gave you nothing, you wouldnt be free.

1 point

He gave Adam and Eve a specific tasks, that was not to eat from the fruit. He gave them both a choice to obey or disobey him. Adam and Eve were free to do anything they wanted, except eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Genesis 2:16-17, “And the LORD God commanded the man, ‘You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die.’” If God had not given Adam and Eve the choice, they would have essentially been robots, simply doing what they were programmed to do. God created Adam and Eve to be “free” beings, able to make decisions, able to choose between good and evil. In order for Adam and Eve to truly be free, they had to have a choice.

1 point

Rest is a word used in many ways. For example, a ceasing.

2 points

The US invaded Iraq for so called WMDs, no WMDs were found......

1 point

Come on man! This isn't a religon debate. In fact, this isn't a debate at all. It's all opinionated.

3 points

For me,classical rock and rock in general, like Led Zepplin,Guns and Roses,Black Viel Brides,Fall out boy,AC/DC,MGMT, any kind of music associated with those examples.

1 point

You said,"The fury that China is about to bring", you can't determine the future, you are not divine,let alone able to read. I never said China doesn't have a Airforce or Navy, I said China's Airforce and Navy is less superior than the US. You are living in imagination,you really think a enemy nation would supply their enemies with technology? As you so carelessly said. You're spelling is a number one example of an atrocity, my friend.

1 point

I wasn't saying all of Islam are extremist, and religon can threaten someone. Many Pentecostal-Christians threaten homosexuality, many Muslims depise Western culture, many theist attack atheist for not being a believer, maybe you should do some research on common sense my friend. How would you classify the Crusades of the Knights Templars? And you said a majority of muslims aren't Al-Qaeda, you said that as if the Al-Qaeda was small, Al-Qaeda is a rather large organization. A larger Majority of a factor will rule over the other half or sides. As I said before, no one is innocent.

1 point

I didn't mean all of Islam were extremist, Religon CAN threaten someone, many theist attack atheist for not being believers. On opinion a larger majority of a factor rules over the other,maybe you should do some research on common sense my friend, a majority pentecostal-Chirstians attack homosexuality, many Muslims hate "culture" in general. How would you generalize The First Crusade? As I said All religons can be threats or be threathen.

1 point

1)The U.S. did not give up on Iraq,Pakistan,Iran, or Afghanistan.

2) The Nuclear bombs were manufactured by the US.

3) The "Slumbering Dragon" comment was not made by me, that comment was discreetly made by a friend..

4) The U.S. crushes the Taliban in every headfirst firefight, that is why the Taliban uses "Guerrilla Tactics", similar to the NVA or the VC.

5) I never said the U.S. would use nuclear force against China,you joke.

6) Most of your sentences don't make sense due to your carelessness,you joke.

1 point

Being a real atheist you need solid proof, being a real theist you need solid faith. Each side is lacking both. You cannot call yourself a Christian and not pay your dues to god. You cannot call yourself an atheist if choose not to believe in God/gods because of "personal happenings" and worldly conflicts.

1 point

Nice grammatical errors. Note this is a debate forum, not a remedial class. As far as I know,the English language should urinate on you!

1 point

I wasn't categorizing them as successes or failures, I was categorizing them a US led false flags. And are you saying 9/11 was successful false flag?

1 point

A fetus is a parasite. A parasite is One who habitually takes advantage of the generosity of others without making any useful return.

1 point

Ha Ha! What an ignorant question indeed! China lacks Air and both Naval superiority,and i don't believe Russia will be on board with China in invading the U.S. Russia and China aren't exactly "amigos".

1 point

Many people in America abuse the English language by using slang in repetition. But i live in Texas (where many Mexican immigrants flood into),still i do not categorize that as an excuse. I believe, if your going to come to another country for a better life (illegally at that!) at least contribute into learning its customs.


1 of 3 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]