A dimension of time is nothing more than a detail of time. The accuracy of time can be increased and decreased like focus on a camera to understand an image of area.
Time is a mathematical absolute that was formulated, then written, it has a self-value. It is not a premise relating to theory, time is a mathematic ratio of (12:60, 1:60, 1:60) what it looks like t the eye is that motion cannot be measured without the use of the mathematic ratio set to as a single velocity that translate from energy by use of inertial force to scale. This is complicated to explain directly but might be better said as all motion on a clock is made at the identical speed it is just in different scale. This makes the observation wrong as you see the second faster than the hour.
The fact is space and energy can expand without time it will simply go unrecorded by accurate means. Space-time is plagiarism of the mathematic ratio as if it had no self-value. There is a ways to calculate mathematically dimensions of time. They simply are not anywhere near what they are proposed to be by science fiction.
DID relativity PROVE time not to be absolute?
Is it now called the Law of Relativity?
Special relativity is simple accepting that General Relativity was incorrect.
My grievance is that time has been corrupted at the dimension of second, by associating a ratio which is not proportioned into the original ratio. This forces the absolute mathematic to be relative by numeric corruption. As Special Relativity and Time now share the same numerical irrational state when they did not always.
It could be true, I may be an idiot. So I will need an answer from a superior mind like your own. Do numbers normally have two decimal points? Is Special Relativity is a calculus equation which implicates relationships between ration? If so does it required that absolute time be corrupted to give an appearance of its relationship?
It would be rude at this point, even maybe unfair not to try and describe what would happen to a dimension of time past three, and why. Time is a mathematical absolute because it is created in relationship to the principle of square which is related to degrees of a circle...
There are only 360 degrees in a circle, and the degrees are broken down also by hours, minutes, and seconds. Thus three demission’s of time. 1. Hours. 2. Minutes. 3. Seconds. The Forth demission of time is simply just simplified like many other mathematic fractions.( 2/4 = ½)
I respect the idea of all who have posted here and am not trying to issuant anyone.
Though not formally a part of institutional physics I have written a law of gravity which simply states. All gravity is elasticity, modulation, and reverberation. This is an addition to Newton’s laws of motion. As it describes gravity in such a way that is not directly related to the motions of inertia force, and centrically force.
Gravity has no effect on mathematical absolute alone, other than by meaning being used as a description of the ability for humanities corruption to destroy scientific evidence in some way. Example: The gravity of that action had a direct result in the outcome being recorded.
Time is a mathematical absolute to which space is part of by design. Where space is warped, only energy can be warped. There appears to be some concept or principle of mathematical absolute not understood if the hypothesis states space and time are connected in any way.
Almost all parts of the seen universe are space without time as the mathematic absolute has not been interpreted correctly by physics. Creating space is not a reasonable objective for scientific grievance.
Space and energy came before Time. Time is a mathematical absolute to which space is part of by design.
As far as time and dimension is concerned. Time is a mathematical absolute, and as it is formulated as square by ratio, this means when an additional dimension is added to square, the mathematical principle is proportioned to cube which is then capable of reduction to square again. Hence that is why Time is a mathematical absolute.
FYI it was formulated from a circle so all interpretation of mathematic motion is set the same way.
There is no argument for time here, it is only an argument of energy. Time is a mathematic absolute. What mankind has proven is that the math can be performed incorrectly and for the most part people would not understand the mistake.
Freedom is a word used to describe an object. Liberty and independence are words to describe the united state people like to feel but accidently call freedom. The rules of free describe a person conduct as being done without cost or self-value. Which is almost impossible. This is why the word free describes objects, ever notice that the First Amendment does not say freedom of grievance? Grievance is a united state of speech, press, and religion.
My understanding is the reporter writes for the press, and the press publishes for the reader.
Freedom of the press describes a basic principle, The United State is all writing hold no cost or self-value. It is only people who fix price as cost, or self-value on all and any writings. The first Amendment then goes on to describe a boundary set by free speech, free Press, within the distance of filed grievance and peaceful assembly.
Which is said in another words freedom is the loss of both self-value and appointed cost.
Gravity is Modulation, Elasticity, and Reverberation.
The effect of gravity is made on motion. Gravity was described by Isaac Newton as a law of motion. Gravity consumes space as well as the earth. Modulation is countered by reverberation equaling a direction against resistance show as density of an object.
Yes, it has to be murder. But! murder takes place in two ways not one described by religious definition set as words and admission of guilt once made by midwife long ago.
By medical standard a woman is killing a life by simply allowing embryo to go unfertile, while a man is then forced to murder countless lives as he would be chosen by a woman in advance, then used as creator of living substance to fertilize only one embryo to spare her of this fate of death by becoming creator of life in the Human Reproduction System.
No wonder there is a religious story of Adam and Eve the truth is a horrible fact of nature almost every-one is unwilling to face. And it is the year 2018.
Right now the medical and scientific world share one definition when life begins.
Slavery 1857 the reasons a slave did not have any described United States Constitutional right was caused by lack of representation of record on emancipation from united state of prisoner of war. As wording emancipation is simply re-describing publicly free as equal to liberty and it is not by fact that way. The point of the argument in court was made against the United States Constitution for not having a definition of meaning which could ever describe a man, woman , or child as not having self-value or appointed cost, and this definition is still missing today.
Ironically the liberty of the slaves of the South should be attributed to Abraham Lincoln by a Military decree as executive order, in services rendered by foreign prisoners of war setting a larger boundary for civility and independence.
Why is abortion right? Simple it is an admission of guilt to a felony crime made publicly.
Why is abortion wrong? Simple it is an admission of guilt to a felony crime made publicly with a transformable self- incrimination that can be cast on the public
Why else is pregnancy abortion wrong? Its use is out of context set by official understanding. The term abort is a pause/stop made in an official start of an event, by which a life threating, or dangerous malfunction is the motivation of paused/stop to allow a determination to either terminate, or proceed with the official process. The aborted process is allowed to continue till its natural completion.
It is Ironic but the argument of debate for abortion applies to a woman as she only ever pauses death created when she does not have sexual relations, or artificial insemination, not with the stopping a pregnancy that is on going.
they can be trick or willingly admit guilt to a felony crime and loose rights. Since you asked.
Keep in mind posterity is placed in writing within Preamble of the United States Constitution. This means the first order of a United State of woman should be, must be, removed themselves from any Admission of guilt of crime, or accusation of crime before representation before the United States Constitution, so she too can obtain constitutional right as creator, then partner in creation of this described posterity.
This process of description sets a legal fact all woman are created equal according to the law in this way so it might be witness to young and old alike.
Yes a United State can be set showing a right for the unborn to live.
First is Genetic human cloning, then artificial womb children, test tube babies, advanced A.I robots, finally children who are conceived by parents.
Understand something clearly abortion by its admission of guilt in a crime set a poor practice loose in a United State of Constitution. It is hard to make any arguments here without setting a proper use of the word abortion in the context to what it describes.
What we do know as fact it is not the intention of humanity to place a limit on birth by use of womb for all people as a single right, as medical and scientific precedent has already been made to make that impossible while the argument struggles with issues of independence. There is more than one group of people who are united as a single group by this question in Constitutional principle.
I am not prepared to make arguments on this level of principle in a basic fashion and from the looks of the comments so far there is a great deal of representation missing.
Not really, America as a democracy has influence elections internationally for quite some time politically. This means many enemies have been nurtured to a way of questionable ethics. To think maybe some-one should have understood we are a United State of Constitutional right a promoted a united union on Constitutional state comes to mind.
As socialism works with communism yet is the enemy of independence, and United State is a regulation set against socialism which limits dictatorship of communism. This is how a democratic republic Military command can be relieved of duty making it unique in the world.
Yes, I am saying an admission to a crime is legal even if the woman believes she is in danger, or is really in danger. There are several Unite states created by the use of the word abortion. Outside the biggest which is an admission of guilt, there is the transferable self-incrimination, and outside the transferable self-incrimination there is a miss-use of the word abortion.
Abortion is an official stop/pause used only on things to have been officially started to address issues concerning life threating malfunctions. The process which is aborted is either restarted, or terminated for safety. Abortion on the other hand takes place with a really woman when she does not become pregnant while she goes through menstruation up until menopause.
The medical profession and genetic sciences see the human embryo as alive and its life is simply extended in a couple ways, cryogenic freezing, and pregnancy are different ways of preserving a living thing that has already been documented. So it is the stopping of the conception process which is when an abortion takes place according to the principle of the word. The other circumstance is termination or female specific amputation.
The reason why legislation of law around the word abortion is illegal. Self-incrimination is never addressed to a standard of United States Constitution the crime is never verbally removed from the admission of guilt. The demonstration set to protect the United States Constitution is female specific amputation. This admission has no self-incrimination of guilt. this places all voters in danger of committing perjury or become accomplish after the fact. both of which would remove them as legal voters.
