We are not free to voice hate by United States Constitution the people assume the powers of liberty not freedom. We are at liberty to voice a grievance of hate by way that can be seen as filed.
A grievance is substantiated, or unsubstantiated and debate shares this connection with grievance. Most all things that have been create at one time had been imagined first so it would be generalizing an opinion to say real and imaginary. A grievance is a strong disagreement with some display of substance of dispute, this substance can act as target to be addressed directly. So if the substance of topic is answered it is no longer a grievance.
A grievance is an expression of self-value which may be contradictive to its appointed cost in the public. A grievance is a declaration of independence and debate is not. A debate makes no claim of self-value a person maybe assigned to one side.
Public fraud is about two things the wording and money. The grievance is Global Warming the conundrum is if there was an ice age there has to be a warming for the ice to have melted. Just to point out a United States that is talk about publicly when most people bring up the topic Global Warming or Climate change they are talking about Human Climate Manipulation.
When a group of people can intentionally add by knowledge things that they know will complicate the focus of research made on a public grievance/complaint they are in fact stalling. Global warming arrived shortly after public storm water runoff evaluations had been made. So who thinks dumping billions of tones of Salt and chemical dicers on frozen water is a Warming process? Who believes it is done on purpose by people?
Okay so if Mexico has found a common defense to the general welfare for Mexico on admission of guilt made on murder why has the principle not been shared with the rest of Mexico? Simply allowing one type of admission of murder for woman to go without judicial separation for public protection isn’t really a united state of basic right.
Everyone should pay for their own admission of guilt to a felony crime if it is found to be true. What is questioned is does Mexico have reason why all woman as a United States must make a felony admission of guilt publicly? There are some ideas of what makes abortion illegal. The crime that is publicly admitted as a lie. Is it the self-incrimination which askes all voters to take part in a felony crime.
Funny there is a lot of talk about Russian commission in voter tampering, yet many nations allowing the voter to admit or take part in a admitted felony crime which is grounds for vote restriction is Okay?
Totally unrelated to the United States of America.
All the Capitalism Karl Marx never addressed. Capitalism by basic principle is independence. Nothing more and it is the human Nature which initiates economic failures by use of philosophy. Marx was educated as civil counsel unbound to a United State Constitutional principle and become stateless due to publications he had written.
Two important facts Marx did not address United State by Constitution and Marx became stateless. Was this a coincidence, doubtful. Also all Capitalism would remember of Marx is he was by principle a capitalist as his belief was that Capital holdings could be owned. His grievance was over only who takes ownership as an understanding to power.
Socialism is the enemy of independence. Marx wanted the independence without the burdens of question.
The dimension of Time written as a Time Dimensional Expansion. (T.D.E.) Rights Reserved.
12:00 PM can become 12:00:00:01 the :01 is the 4th dimension of time and disappears when the 4th dimension of time reaches this point 12:59:59:59PM Time is simplified by mathematics to 1:00 AM
This time 01:00:00:00 AM is identical to this time 01:00 AM in accuracy by principle of time.
Grievance calling BS, by adding a decimal point the ratio 12:00:00.0 AM makes the whole thing less accurate period. Rights Reserved.
Still None sense?
John_C you are writing utter incoherent gibberish which makes no sense and follows no logical chain of thought.
Untrue the train of though is the errors which make General Relativity the corruptor of mathematic principle with the use of Pi and decimal point position. A numerical decimal position .01, 1/100th The ratio of Time 12:00:00 AM should not have a decimal point like this 12:00:00.00 AM it should be written and translated like this 12:00:00:00 AM the logic is to keep the integrity of the ratio of absolute time.
A Generalized Question: 12:00 PM occurs in and on all these places at the same instant. The Earth, the Moon, Mars, Saturn, Our solar system, the Milky Way, and the Universe. They are in a place of boundary called space. For many reasons the Time 12:00 PM though shared as one instant by all these places does not occur in the same space at that one instant.
Is Time a dimension of space? No Time is not a dimension of space it is mathematic. No straw man argument here. An answer is given, and the detail of the answer is explained so it can be found independently confirmed or disproven by debate.
Let me explain:
First: E=Mc^2 is mentioned in the forum as means to Space-Time being an effect of energy warping space. I have grievances related to your interpretation of General relativity but then we are creating a straw man argument. So back on focus. (gravity) = 8pi G x (energy and momentum). = (H=8piG) = ( E=Mc^2)
There is a basic mathematic violation made by ratio when Pi is used in relativity’s formulation to assume quantity of energy, mass, or volume. On one side of linear form or both E (Pi is implanted often by math never removed) = Mc^2 (Pi is implanted by math and often never removed) this is a violation to fixed linear algebra as the equation must detail Pi and exclusion.
The grievance is in the way decimal state is shared with Absolute Time (12:60), (1:60), (1:60) Uncorrupted. Absolute Time (12.00:60.00), (1.00:60.00), (1.00:60.00) corrupted. the decimal point is added to second under the idea it is adding accuracy. It is by grievance changing the ratio uniting to relative with Pi. Einstein loved Pi.
Kinetic energy is KE = 5.5 x mv^2 O
Mass M = F/a (force/acceleration)
Volume
1. Cube = a^3 O
2. Rectangular = abc O
3. Cylinder = Pi r^2 h X
When a decimal point is added to a formulation of Time a center and change of direction are implied. The decimal point is the new start for a linear addition of value to take place going on the opposite direction of the whole number. The whole number is not continued by use of ratio. Still giberish
Excuse me! Strawman argument? First: Yes, I set mathematic evidence on the boards saying that the ratio of absolute time is. >>>> (12:60, 1:60, 1:60) <<<<< The fact of mathematics then states that adding a decimal point is a corruption of that set Absolut when set inside the numbers held in ratio by it. You are literally presenting no mathematic rebuttal. Zero. None. Nada. Pi and the numerical state of decimal numbers like (.1, .24, .4617) are what makesE=Mc^2 look relative to time. The most basic math translation between time and space is round and square.
Clearly you do not grasp the basic mathematics involved here1:10(is the language of a numerical decimal ratio) and 1: 60 is a ratio of absolute time. Either these two are the same ratio, or they are not? This according to physics. It is you who are making the strawman defense because you are giving credit to the planarization of time by fictional physics/ Science fiction. Not mentioned above in the title of the debate.
The grievance is that Space X, Y, and Z is cube, when equal area as condition is set. (X= 10, Y = 10, and Z = 10) While if we write this as X=10, Y = 10 it is now square again not complicated abstract math. Absolute time is Hour, Minute, and Second. Times fourth state is degree also know by science fiction as the 4th dimension. If you like I will formulate it so you can write and explain how Isaac Newton might also explain the addition of multiple dimension of time and how it is then simplified down to one if necessary.
“Just W.T.F.”
Again strawman argument, Not! Is time a dimension of space? no and all of what has been written is explaining why.
You present a strawman defense to the grievance I bring to the debate. All you are saying is not related and you don’t act like you understand the math here.
First it is not all of physics I am in disagreement with, in fact there are laws of motion shown with simple numbers I presented as evidence on times behalf. I’m not asking you to follow my law of gravity, the law tells you why you are following that law of gravity. I am the writer. Gravity is a motion. People are an object that can be moved. Elasticity is energy one, modulation is energy two, and finally reverberation is energy three, when these accumulated energies are set to scale and proportion objects move. The motion is then called gravity. Again not a straw man argument. As the use of Einstein theory places relevance to gravity in topic.
So let there be physics and let there be science fiction. We both know that physics is science fiction when the word theory is place in front, or behind the discussion. We both know it is grievance when the statement has numbers as a direct exchange of principle.
The grievance expressed is based in ratio. (12: 60, 1: 60, 1: 60) then adding that Pi as an irrational state is abused by its relativity to the ratio of the decimal system. .1, .2, .3, .4, and .5 these numbers express a change in direction of motion to scale as well. They count upward form one while at the same time counting upward from .1 in the opposite direction. This means a premature numerical center is created. The arc of the scale is not equal to the curve of the whole.
So a square and a sphere are in general mathematically relative? Please share they are what both shapes?
You are arguing mathematic principle with the idea of medication, making accusations of over medication, or lack of proper medication. How original.
What is funny is Einstein and many mathematicians cannot see the independence between a cube and a ball, area and velocity, and the person who can is the one overmedicated. By the way Flora it is not a theory it is an observation of mathematical fact. General and Special Relativity are the theory, remember that is why it was titled the Theory of relativity.
What I am expressing is a grievance not theory.
Why Time and space are not relative.
Space is a cube X, Y, and Z.
Time is a sphere. Two or more spheres set by proportion can be used to remove the use of Pi principle and replace it with a ratio. ( 4Pir^2). Pi is the focus of relativity to cube not time.
All that is added mathematically by physics with space-time and the theory of general and special relativity is dimension of space changes from where you stand inside of the area. That’s it. To some up why Einstein is wrong about the relativity of time. Time is the circle to square cubit of space. Why time works in the square is 4 -90 degree angles can from a square 360:180 and 270:90 are right angle triangles held by a radius of circle. Form two circle we get square.
Why the plagiarism dictates that time must be bend to space is a square bends space to try and mimic how the circle creates the arc of every circle. Using algebra and fix equation at some point of scale the arc reverts to straight line. Many people may disagree as to why this is, but I relate it to motion and a need for an additional Pi described as yPi.
All that is added mathematically by physics with space-time and the theory of general and special relativity is dimension of space changes from where you stand inside of the area. That’s it. To some up why Einstein is wrong about the relativity of time. Time is the circle to square cubit of space. Why time works in the square is 4 -90 degree angles can from a square 360:180 and 270:90 are right angle triangles held by a radius of circle. Form two circle we get square.
Okay looking past the humor of short sightedness of mathematics. As a person who truly hates math I understand your choice of wording. Let’s ask a question that will piss them off. It is 12:00 o’clock on earth, there are currently 37 local times in use on earth. Wat time is it on Mars.
My restarted answer to the question is if it is 12:00 o’clock on Earth, it is 12:00 o’clock on Mars. So this is what we are not saying when we ask for an exact time on Mars, it is 12:00 o’clock noon where? The answer is we must be on mars to find out all we know for sure is it is only 12:00 o’clock one place on mars and one place on earth. This will take place at the same instant.
I question myself every day when translating mathematic time, I must go to work but will answer the question later. Your question of my translation is not taken personal.
The loss of mathematic principle to explain plagiarism. Absolute time 21:60, 1:60, 1:60 the corruption of the principle reads as follows (21.0:60.0, 1.0:60.0, and 1.0:60.0).The principle is that a cube is more accurate to define space then a sphere. When the final shape is unknown does it matter?
The saying can’t fit a square peg in a round hole describes Time. Space is the square = X, Y, and Z. Time is the round circle = 360 degrees.
The problem is space-time is a plagiarism of absolute time. 12:60, 1:60, 1:60 = Absolute Time
By the way I have to write this question so I can understand were your idea of time is mathematically, plus or minus 10 nanoseconds compared to what? An absolute time you and I both admit is not mathematically absolute anymore, and you don’t know why until the mention of different forms of ratio?
My grievance is not demonstrated false you are saying Sat nav is the system holding inconsistency’s with the use of atomic time. To point out an observation Einstein never translated a way to calculate absolute time so it may be taken with an object that is traveling faster than the speed of light.
While by observation it appears atomic time has a problem with just the speed of sound. I’m I correct?
The ability to increase and decrease mathematic focus is not relativity.
I can agree easily Time is not absolute. But! The grievance is it was absolute, then made relative by human error.
