True and that's not the point. It's not static. It's directional. The polarization is resolved and the last cognitive dissonance will be resolved on the day of Hunter Biden's next court appearance if not before, cheers, hello Fascist Theocracy, yay for some, boo for others, life ain't fair unless it is
The precise meaning of words is important in this context. To whom does "the evil one" refer? Perhaps it is pointing to a certain politician or the wealthiest individuals in society. It seems to suggest that those who reject traditional concepts of morality and "sin" have more lucrative opportunities available to them than those committed to a strict ethical code. From another perspective, "sin" could be viewed as simply the opposite of following a virtuous path or an ideal of goodness. But the speaker feels the core idea is that the pursuit and concentration of excessive wealth is damaging the world. And most rational people would likely concur that unrestrained greed and the prioritization of profits above all else is detrimentally impacting global societies and environments. So while the semantics may be debated, the speaker believes the fundamental takeaway is that the continuous accumulation of wealth, often obtained through dubious means, is destroying the planet and this is an issue we should all care about.
