America Is A Place Where Reality Has Been Turned Upside Down
Yes
Side Score: 8
|
 |
No
Side Score: 6
|
|
|
|
|
2
points
1) Guns are designed to kill, it's true, but when other people have guns and you don't then they can kill you but you can't kill them, which puts you at a slight disadvantage. It's retarded to want to restrict guns while the most insane people on earth like Kim jong un and the US fucking government have DRONES AND NUKES YOU FUCKING MORON. If you make any firearm illegal or restrict anything to do with guns all you will be doing is taking it away from law abiding citizens while criminals find alternatives and ways to illegal procure these banned weapons. Your obsession with gun restriction is FUCKING STUPID. AND THE WORST CRIMINALS ON EARTH ARE THE FUCKING GOVERNMENTS OF EVERY FUCKING COUNTRY SO WHY DON'T YOU TAKE THEIR GUNS YOU SUBHUMAN SACK OF AFTERBIRTH RESIDUE. 2) Hitler was a socialist, socialists are far left. Socialism is the very definition of far left. 3) All superstition, religion, and spirituality is primitive retard bullshit. None are worse then judaism, christianity and islam. 4) Economic warfare might have contributed to the collapse of the soviet union but that alone isn't sufficient enough to make the claim that communism is good. 5) Illegally invading sovereign states and claiming that they are "liberating" them is something that people like Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller made happen, not capitalism or the "republic" system. 6) The american government does work that way except when it comes to constitutional rights. 7) No one claims that we single-handedly won both world wars. 8)There are plenty of reasons why america sucks and most of them are due to globalism, your list of reasons suck and I'm going to start a debate called "globalism has turned america upside down" Both communism and capitalism are fundamentally insufficient but a true anarcho-capitalist free market or a small government republic are FAR SUPERIOR to communism. Side: Yes
0
points
Guns are designed to kill, it's true, but when other people have guns and you don't then they can kill you but you can't kill them, which puts you at a slight disadvantage. Your Brobdingnagian sized stupidity is what puts you at a disadvantage. When you legalise guns then you are not the only person permitted to buy them. Hence, you are proposing a solution to a problem (i.e. people having guns) which only exists because of your proposed solution (i.e. that people should have guns). It's exactly like saying we should legalise murder to protect us against murderers. Quite frankly, it's the most overtly stupid, circular piece of idiocy in the history of the world. Hitler was a socialist, socialists are far left No, he was not. Open a history book you cringeworthy buffoon. When the greatest liar in 20th century history claims to be something, then you should not blindly assume he is telling you the truth. National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), more commonly known as Nazism (/ˈnɑːtsi.ɪzəm, ˈnæt-/),[1] is the ideology and set of practices associated with the 20th-century German Nazi Party, Nazi Germany and other far-right groups. Usually characterized as a form of fascism that incorporates scientific racism and antisemitism, Nazism's development was influenced by German nationalism (especially Pan-Germanism), the Völkisch movement and the anti-Communist Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged during the Weimar Republic after Germany's defeat in the First World War. The majority of scholars identify Nazism in both theory and practice as a form of far-right politics.[13] Far-right themes in Nazism include the argument that superior people have a right to dominate other people and purge society of supposed inferior elements.[14] Adolf Hitler and other proponents denied the view that Nazism was either left-wing or right-wing, instead they officially portrayed Nazism as a syncretic movement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ You understand the way that works, you spectacularly dumb rent-a-tool? Hitler wanted votes from the left wing as well as the right wing. I'm not reading any more of your stupid, egregious tripe. Anybody who genuinely tries to argue that Hitler was on the left is of a level of ignorance which is almost certainly entirely irreversible. Side: No
2
points
1) Guns are not used to attack. They are used to defend. They protect rather than kill. So if everyone is defending, Where is the attacker? Imagine an 11 men team soccer players standing in their goal post claiming to be defending and the other side;the supposed opposition , also taking the same action of defence in their goal post. Err... 1st half to end of second half nothing happens.... Man why don't everybody just get the fuckout of the pole nothing is going to happen. No? Everybody believes everybody is bad. Haha So just taking security measures. I mean every police man should go home now, the citizens just took your jobs.. Capricious civil war loading. Just takes one bullet to mistakenly(to maintain a defensive position you don't have to do it deliberately) go off and every one will start a defensive retaliation. Blood everywhere but am still as holy as an angel, i was only protecting myself. The American Dream. I Just love it. 2) Hitler was on the left. Probably a Commie. Left and right only means directions were i come from. 3) My insane monotheistic religion is awesome. Yours is evil. I am not religious, i am spiritual. 4) Soviet Communism collapsed without any help from us. Cold War? What Cold War? People were hungry 5) Illegally invading sovereign UN states is the same thing as "liberating" them. From what? Since when? and is there any measurable positive progress. I can measure one. The last time a country was liberated by America, living standards got 4times worse than before; Libya. 6) When we pass laws in America, they apply everywhere else in the world. I have a very big problem with. African children are so stuuuuuuppppppiiiiiddd. Even the university graduate and celeb. They are so west influenced. Go to popular social medias and see these stupid kids who steal parents money to buy fancy things to be recognised on social media(Oh God sum up all that mony for me, i can do better with that). The University of Ghana, Legon, have students(supposed educated) who celebrate halloween. Celebs on television suggesting the entire nation adopt halloween. A journalist live on air expressing her wishes to spend pounds in her country. Any African who fights for Africa now onwards is the biggest fool ever after hearing of Qadafi, Nkrumah, etc。... America will pay some idiotic illiterate(perhaps still as a university graduate) to sabotage to you. you will die demonised like the heros i mentioned, with your real intentions buried with you. It has been so with Africa even from the time of Hannibal barca when he was defeated by Scopio Africanus (another african), serving as a the main playout that led to Africa losing world political power. Young Africans seem to be begging to be slaves so they are taken to America. If i should be destined to save that continent, i wouldn't need hungry people but rather will need God to fish out those idiots(described up there) for me so i can burn all of them like toilet paper and encourage more births where i educate new children. These ones are fools. 7) We single-handedly won both world wars. Single handedly bombed Japan and single handedly rebuilt them....yeah that is a both juggler Side: Yes
1
point
1
point
@FactMachine. I don't understand, Anarcho-Communism has alot in common with the Venus Project, why do you hate him for that specific idea so much. I have not seen/read Nomenclature's views on Communism, is he more in line with the Lenninist Communist Party Structure/violent revolution scheme (e.i. Dictatorship of the Proletariat, ect.) and this is what you are objecting to strongly? Or do you think that I am really just missing the boat? If so, I would be interested to hear your thoughts on the topic or just direct me to a thread where you have already laid it out. Perhaps this wasn't the best thread to bring this up on since you have been banned Side: Yes
1
point
|
2
points
Guns are not used to attack. They are used to defend. They protect rather than kill No. They do both. Criminals will get guns despite the law. Law abiding citizens unable to legally get guns will be defenseless against criminals who get guns illegally. The Bataclan theatre massacre is what you get when no one can take down the shooter because they can't legally have a gun themselves. Disarming the innocent knowing that the guilty will be armed either way is evil. The point? Nomenclature is evil. Side: No
2
points
1
point
Hitler was on the left. Probably a Commie. 1)Your own link that you provided said that Hitler claimed that Naziism was neither left or right. 2)White supremacists in America used to be the strongarm of the left. 3)The left in America voted for white supremacist Robert Byrd from the 1950's all the way to his death in 2010. Side: No
|
