Well, mindless up-voting tends to be a two-way streak for most things.

In the case of recent religious debates, we have folks like Srom who has multiple accounts that he uses to mass up-vote arguments in support of Christianity, including his own.

So really, Srom is mostly to blame for this one aspect.

So... we can't present some of the most logical arguments????????????????????????????//

I think you just need to evaluate an argument based on the merits and demerits of the points they presented, and how well they countered those they debated with. This, opposed to trusting in the point system to tell who is winning. As was pointed out, people spam up and down votes, sometimes on multiple accounts. I have 0 points on a post against religious violence, and several points on some of my weakest arguments. Popular opinion and supposed "public" support doesn't make someone correct.

What? I'm not sure which arguments you've been looking at, but all of the christian arguments like that I've seen, even ones that dont use circular reasoning, have like at least -1 points.

To be fair, atheists also upvote a lot. It's just that the more experienced debaters here tend to be atheists.

In my opinion Christian arguments are mostly downvoted rather then upvoted. Its mostly the atheists that has irrational up votes.