Climate Change Is Redistribution Of Wealth
"This is a rebuke to those congressional extremists who tried to play politics with desperately needed money to help the world’s poor take climate action," said Karen Orenstein of Friends of the Earth.
Under the Paris Climate Agreement, rich nations committed to deliver $100 billion a year in climate aid beyond 2020, and use that figure as a "floor" for further support agreed by 2025.
More American tax dollars going to waste !
Will these poor countries ever have to show any accountability to where American tax dollars are going that the Progressive Government is giving away ?
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-climatechange-congress-idUSKBN0TZ2ED20151216
|
4
points
3
points
There are three parts to this climate deal. One is the redistribution of wealth from the US to poor countries. Two, forcing global warming down our throats is simply a power grab from the federal government to control individual and states rights. The government will try to tell its citizens what it can and can't do to reduce CO2. Three, the inevitable carbon tax will be coming to pay for this all. So, for liberals, this is a Utopia. 1 Redistribution of wealth 2 More power in the hands of the central government 3 A massive tax that will crush its citizens and make them more dependent on the government The US should allocate such funds towards reconfiguring its own energy grid. The environment entirely aside, our infrastructure is unnecessarily dependent upon the resources of other nations. I prefer a largely decentralized government, but energy infrastructure is one area where I think the federal intervention is a legitimate interest both from a national security vantage as well as from an interstate coordination perspective. |
