CreateDebate


Debate Info

39
29
yes, he should because... No, he should not because...
Debate Score:68
Arguments:29
Total Votes:101
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 yes, he should because... (15)
 
 No, he should not because... (14)

Debate Creator

alicelsy(79) pic



General Percival should be made responsible for the fall of Singapore.

Recall the factors for PETAL. 

What is your stand for this claim. Support with relevant evidence, explanation and link back to question.

yes, he should because...

Side Score: 39
VS.

No, he should not because...

Side Score: 29
5 points

if he was more decisive and knew what he was doing, he would not have given up when the Japanese were threatening him.

Side: yes, he should because...
5 points

Although he and Yamashita both has good leadership skills, he lost to Yamashita just because he was soft-hearted and kind. Yes, a good leader should take care of his own country at the same time win, but, just because he pity the Japanese, he think it's okay to surrender. The Japanese had already invaded a lot of places and sacrificed themselves and the British troops, but, just because of General Percival, he made the british troops wasted their sacrifices, moreover, the years of torture by the Japanese. Singapore, being called Shonan-to . Disrespect from the Japanese. All these are the consequences of General Percival's action. Thus, he should be made responsible.

Side: yes, he should because...
3 points

General Percival has weak and hesitant leadership for the British troops in Malaya and Singapore.

He miscalculated the Japanese Invasion by predicting that they will attack from the south, but the Japanese attack from the north. He did not move his defence to the north, making it easier for the Japanese to attack.

Side: yes, he should because...
3 points

General Percival is a LEADER. The responsibility of the survival of Singapore is in his hands. He should have the leadership to help Singapore to victory. Having enough troops and other supplies, loosing the battle just shows what bad leadership General Percival has.

Side: yes, he should because...
dragonorman(5) Disputed
3 points

He did not had troops with enough skills, not trained well for jungle warfare and not familiar with the terrain and mainly skill is what is needed to win and number cannot help sometimes against skill and this was an example of that.

Side: No, he should not because...
bj97(1) Disputed
1 point

General Percival commands this troops,he could have left a few good soldiers and generals to fight for singapore.HE should have already known of the terrain they were fighting which in the jungle.He should been known of it,thus he is responsible for the fall of singapore

Side: yes, he should because...
lot11 Disputed
2 points

He did not have enough supplies. He had no tanks, only two destroyers, and outdated airplanes. The Japanese airplanes were flying circles around the British. The British airplanes were then destroyed, so the British had no air support, subjecting them to air raids. He had enough troops, but they were untrained, and they had low morale, as they were INDIAN. They didn't care for the welfare of Singapore, or of Britain.

Side: No, he should not because...
renchang(2) Disputed
1 point

If he did not have enough supplies, he should have asked for more troops and more planes. As you said, the British airplanes were destroyed therefore having no air support, and this shows that General Percival didn't put much effort in the planning of the defense well enough.

Side: yes, he should because...
3 points

He should because if not for his poor leadership, British would have defeated Japanese because then, the British had the upper hand compared with the Japanese on the number of man power. Percival was hesitant too which demoralized the morale of the troops.

Side: yes, he should because...
2 points

he is too softhearted and made lousy predicament. the refuse to attack the japanese too

Side: yes, he should because...
2 points

General Percival was undecisive because he needed to seek help from his subordinates. He could not decide himself what to do. He also underestimated the Japanese and he did not command enough troops to defend the Japanese from the north.

Side: yes, he should because...
2 points

He deployed the troops and made all the decisions.He should be made responsible for the failure of his troops and decisions or defence. He is too focused on defending britian and did not focus too much on defending singapore.He believed that the japanese were easy to attack,this understimation led to the fall thus he should be responsible.

Side: yes, he should because...
4 points

He should not be held responsible, as there was a war going on in Britain, so they kept best troops and generals in Britain to defend it. General Percival was given a makeshift army, with most of the troops from India, with little or no training in warfare. He was also given outdated equipment, which were inferior to the Japanese equipment. He could do little with the resources that he had, as the Japanese were more skilled in jungle warfare, and he had untrained troops to fight the Japanese. This is why General Percival should not be held responsible for the fall of Singapore.

Side: No, he should not because...
alicelsy(79) Disputed
2 points

However, he should gather enough intelligence before the meeting with Yamashita. Intelligence could provide him with information on the size of the Japanese troops. He was the one who signed the treaty and he made the decision in a hasty manner.

Side: yes, he should because...
bj97(1) Disputed
0 points

The best generals should be evenly distributed.Because good generals are needed so that they can lead the troops. He would have know of the terrain that they were fighting which is in the jungle.He did not use the resources he had to the full potential for effective defence against japan

Side: yes, he should because...
3 points

He was following orders from Winston Churchill. He may have wanted to attack the Japanese in a different way, but he was never told if he could do so. He was unsure to attack and in what way and thus he had to keep retreating as he did not get any new orders. He may have wanted to just stop retreating and charge at the Japanese, but he was not sure to disobey his senior and fight.

Side: No, he should not because...
bj97(1) Disputed
1 point

Yes.General Percival was following orders from Winston Chill.But as ''MapleEvan'' has said he was unsure about the decisions.Which means he have the right to choose whether he should be attacking or defending.Thus due to the wrong decision,he should be made responsible for the fall of singapore.

Side: yes, he should because...
3 points

he did not have troops who were willing to die for Singapore as it is not their land. Also all the best British soldiers were left to defend Britain from Hitler and the Germans. He also did not receive the latest equipments from Britain as they were being used in Britain and their weapons were mostly outdated and used in World War 1 so, they had a disadvantage.

Side: No, he should not because...
KokYin(9) Disputed
2 points

Even though he did not have troops who were wiling to die for Singapore, but British has sent a lot of people to fight back. The amount of people compared to the Japanese as 1:3.

Side: yes, he should because...
2 points

His decision was not rejected by the other generals.The other generals did not rebel with him about the prediction he made.

Side: No, he should not because...
1 point

The commitment level became a very important determinant for the outcome of the war. The British forces were not wholly focused on defending Malaya. The British commitment in defending Malaya could be questioned. During the time, Britain was not just fighting a war in the Far East. It was also fighting a war at home. By 1938, Europe was engulfed by World War Two. Germany, under Adolf Hitler, had begun its assault on Britain. Britain was therefore fighting for its own survival and resources were allocated to its own defense above other British colonies. Logically, the best soldiers and generals were kept to defend Britain. For this reason, Britain could not defend Malaya and Singapore with much conviction, all these created a weak defense and uncommitted disposition which compromised their caution. As such, the forces miscalculated, thus allowing the Japanese to invade with ease. With the right attitude and commitment, the British forces could have overcome the Japanese technological supremacy. After all, the British did have the numerical advantage.

From there, I conclude that General Percival should not be made responsible for the fall of Singapore, because the resources available to him were 'sub-standard' to a certain extent.

Side: No, he should not because...
2 points

If he was a good leader, he could have changed the methods used. Like Yamashita, He could trick he british and the Japanese were already running out of food and water but yet Yamashita did not give up.

Side: No, he should not because...
1 point

General Percival is ordered to do what he has to do like to turn the defences to the seaward. He personally wanted to put the defences to the North and he was only granted permission to do that before the day of the Northward assault by the Japanese. He also cared about the welfare of his citizens and probably the surrender was his last contribution to the Singapore.

Side: No, he should not because...
1 point

He is not the main one in charge. At that time, his thoughts must be in panic because of the fact that his home town is under attack. The Prime minister of Britain did not give the good generals and soldiers to defend singapore, instead he keep all the generals and soldiers to defend homeland. The equipment used to defend singapore is also outdated, even though Singapore is one of the most well defended places in South East Asia.

Side: No, he should not because...
1 point

He should not as it was his nature to be kind hearted and he did not want to put the civilians in danger.

Side: No, he should not because...
0 points

He had very little man, machines and equipment to defend Malaya and Singapore.

Side: No, he should not because...
0 points

No, General Percival should not be made responsible for the fall of Singapore.

General Yamashita threatened General Percival to surrender or else the people in Singapore would be involved and would get hurt. He did not expect that the Japanese would attack from the North of Singapore.

General Percival was indecisive. When threatened by the Japanese, he was worried that the people in Singapore would be injured and he did not want that to happen. Furthermore, he also tried his best in the war, but it was only because they did not expect the unexpected. If Japanese troops were really coming to Singapore from the South, they might win the war instead of the Japanese. He was not the only one in the parliament. He was the leader of the team. This showed that it was not only him but the whole team was responsible.

With all these reasons, General Percival should not be made responsible for the fall of Singapore.

Side: No, he should not because...
bj97(1) Disputed
1 point

General Percival should be made responsible for the fall as he was the one who signed the surrender treaty and make the decisions,even though Yamashita threatened him but he could have not believed his lies.

He did not think ahead into the future if the japanese will ill treat singapore,if general percival continued on fighting,the british could have won and the locals would not have suffered 3 years of suffering under the japanese.

Yes.General Percival is the leader, but not a good leader if he is a good leader he would be able to lead his team well and would not have miscalculated that japan would come from the north.

Side: yes, he should because...
0 points

He was not given any support and his thoughts are rather panicked as war is also happening in Britain. The Prime minister did not provide support such as additional generals and expert soldiers. The equipment the Prime minister provided is outdated and useless, and only provided two ships to defend the seas of Singapore. Despite the fact that Singapore is one of the most advance places in South East Asia.

Side: No, he should not because...