No, I don't NEED to tell you anything. Besides, your ears are tuned to a radical right wing frequency that only hears what you've been programmed TO hear. Frankly, I don't know how you hear ANYTHING with your head in the dingleberry bushes. ;-)

Obviously no they aren't. They are omnivores.

An idiotic assertion, considering the fact that when you look at the actual ratios of plant to animal foods which qualify an organism as one of the 3 they actually overlap. Making it so that many omnivores would be more accurately described as carnivores or herbivores even giving giving you the benefit of the doubt. To classify as a carnivore is an organism needs to eat ONLY 20% MEAT or more. The thing is, you have to look at the PREFERRED source, meaning that an organism might supplement it's diet with meat/plants even if it's a herbivore/omnivore but all animals technically qualify as one of the two and the "true omnivores" always have a preferred source.

That idiot you are impersonating almost died because of his insane belief that staring at the sun is all the body needs for nourishment.

He was a vegan when he believed that, stupid. His beliefs now are totally reasonable, you are just going along with the crowd like a robot by automatically rejecting them. You already suspect that the universe is a simulation based on what you've said in the past, you said that holographic theory is what you think is most likely etc. When you consider the possibility of a flat earth in that context it's actually MORE likely. So humans are carnivores, and if we're in a simulation it's perfectly possible and even more likely the earth is flat.

om·ni·vore

an animal or person that eats food of both plant and animal origin.

So if you don't eat plants then there are carnivores.

car·ni·vore

an animal that feeds on flesh.