Sure, why not? But we don't find out if it's true until we die, and maybe not even then.

Of course, if christianity proved to be true I'd believe in it, hell I'd even argue for it.

If it was proven, than I would believe it. One should base one's beliefs on the evidence.

If proven yes I would believe it.

........................

What I find most interesting about this discussion is that those that do not believe in God (that is in this case the Christian God) do not believe because the evidence provided (or lack thereof) is not sufficient or "enough" for them to believe.

And so, I ask what are you seeking for? Which kinds of evidences will suffice to those whom do not believe in any God? I'll try to present what I believe (as a believer in God) non-believers are looking for.

A. Most importantly and significant, the physical manifestation/deity and of the actual God itself at hand - That is to be able to physically see/view the God in question.

B. A "spiritual encounter" - That is, to be able to sense the God in question; to be able to touch it without actually "seeing" it, to feel it, to hear it to speak, to hear it breathe, without a doubt in mind that the God in question is there.

C. Perhaps to encounter the "additional" aspects of God, that is maybe an angel/demon, a "deity", a "globe of energy", something that is a different form, or "representation", of what's surrounding the notion of God ("angels") and what used to know God ("demons") . Thus, allowing the person to comprehend and realize something is in fact there.

Any thoughts?

Of course! Plenty of people would accept Christianity if the evidence was there that proved Christianity to be true.

If it was proven that God was real, and worthwhile, then yes of course I would believe in him. But the burden of proof is on Christians, and they have presented almost none whatsoever.