Try to discern the fine line between state terrorism and freedom fighting.

We consider Palestinians supporters of terrorism because they detonate themselves in public places, and their leaders have an overt agenda to destroy Israel and claim the land for Muslims. This means that merely giving the Palestinians their own state isn't enough, they would continue to fight Israel until every Jew is dead.

This is why it's such a quagmire, there are people who cannot be reasoned with at the helms.

Palestinians are fighting for their land, that has been occupied by Israel.

It was Israel before it was Palestine.

Israel's occupation of Gaza is condemned by even those who normally side with Israel.

Israel offered awhile back to give the Gaza Strip and several other locations to their enemies; they were refused. All they want is peace!

Israel's forces, using latest tech and fighter jets to kill innocent civilians is more horrible than the 'crimes'

What are you talking about? You must only watch that liberal-bullshit news.

Israel gives aid to the Palestinians; the only reason that they block ships from entering port is to be sure that their enemies don't receive weapons.

Palestinians commit to free their land.

Their land?

Try to discern the fine line between state terrorism and freedom fighting.

What about the Israeli's freedom?

The Palestinians have the rest of the 'Fertile Crescent'.

why do people still say that it is Palestinian land?

when a war is fought, the victor gets the land, we did so with Texas and California in the Mexican war.

in the six days war, Palestine and its allies attacked Israel, Israel won and took over the west bank making it Israeli land. but instead of annexing it (mainly because the Arabians there would go ape shit to be called a Jewish state due to intolerance) the Israelis established an administration over the land to police and keep safety to the area. then Palestine like a nagging women used terrorism and the such to get land back that was now Israeli. and then we have this modern mess.

i would of just annexed the land or pulled out after the war if i were Israel. not do some half and half thing where its partly both the Arabians and Jews land to govern, i mean you give the Arabians a little rope and then they run off with it and bite the owner per se.

in the end two things have to happen. ether Israel instead of forming a slow creep takeover of the land that is theirs but idiotically gave partial control to the Arabians will end and Israel will say to hell with it and annex it. or Israel will have some huge military campaign to obliterate all of Palestine terrorism turning the land into even more of a crap hole and then pull out saying "theres your damn land, don't expect humanitarian aid and crap from us any more". me personally liking the second more because it will end quicker.

"Hamas rejected Israel's ceasefire in advance, saying it would fight on. Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said Israel must withdraw its troops and end its 19-month blockade of the strip.

Hours after the ceasefire began, at 0200 (0000 GMT) on 18 January, Hamas militants shot at Israeli troops in northern Gaza, drawing return fire, and fired rockets into southern Israel, triggering an Israeli air strike in response, the Israeli military said.

But then the group announced its own immediate one-week ceasefire, demanding that Israel withdraw its forces from the Gaza Strip.

Hamas' deputy chief in Syria, Moussa Abou Marzouk, also reiterated long-standing demands for all the crossings to be re-opened for the entry of humanitarian aid, food and other necessities." BBC News

The Israelis are fighting for themselves, if the Palestinians would back off maybe they would too. Just FYI, defending yourself is not an act of terrorism. What is an act of terrorism is making many innocent boys suicide bombers.