I totally agree, no one can defend their opinion simply by the fear of what it will lead to.

Usually airports and different places like that keep data bases. I'm surprised you don't know this, since they have access to all your personal information it is a piece of cake to keep track on who can fly and who can't.

Airports have data bases of drug smuglers and other people who've tried to smuggle things, so that they know in the future to check these people when they fly again. And if someone has a pain in the ass for an airport to keep records of you, then they are welcome to take that fight with the company. Good luck fighting the government.

Everyone keeps records - Your grocery store, your car dealer, your gym, everything you buy stuff from keeps a record of the purchase, and often a record of the buyer. It's not a big deal.

The person not obeying the company's rules would be denied the service this particular company provides. In this case we are talking about flight transportation, which is the service the company would refuse to give the costumer in the future.

Like I said to atrag, I see how it would be a problem to deny someone your service after completing it. But however, you could of course deny them your service in the future. Very few people fly once in their life.

The only scenario where I find it okay for someone to beat up another person, is a cop beating up an uncooperative criminal.

Random people should not be allowed to beat anyone up for any reason, because they could accidentally really hurt the person.

I feel that anyone should live however they feel like, but I don't think a nomadic lifestyle has any deep meaning at all. In most cases where people choose a lifestyle that is so different from the usual civil lifestyle we know, it is for the cause of an opinion or rebel of some sort, religious, social or political.

I can't see how a nomadic lifestyle is inspirational at any point - it is just a bunch of willingly homeless people wanting to stand out from our materialistic world. Wanting to be different is not inspirational, it has become very normal.

But why is humane defined by what causes pain? If we consider killing to be inhumane in the first place, why are we discussing what way to kill is humane?

Is it really within our knowledge what a humane way to kill someone is? We don't know what happens as we die, it's not possible to record what happens during dying and after death.

I have been supporting Obama for some time, but recently I've lost hope in him. He has not done major changes for our country, which in my opinion it really needs. And he has yet to fulfill the promises he made, both before the 2008 election and also 2012.

Valid point. I guess that would be a problem, but you could deny them your service in the future.

Not at all, but since the costumer refuses to obey their rules, they have the right to deny them their service.

Okay then, In the stores I've been most of what I've seen is nicotine free, since that is the point of an e-cigarette