The world has been having wars long before the US even existed. The crusades are an example. Furthermore, the US has tried to stay out of wars and that has ended up backfiring (Pearl Harbor).
China has had several wars, and Africa still has warlords fight. I think unified wars are a good thing, because it means large groups of people are working together, rather than small groups fighting among each other.
Hopefully, one day, everyone will understand everyone and there will no longer be a need for war. But until then, fight and sort out your issues and understand each other better. Wars should be a means to attaining peace and stability in a region. Not something that should be drawn out.
I think that the EU needs Britain, more than Britain needs the EU. The economic stability of the other countries currently is probably hurting Britain more than it is helping it. It would make more sense to kick out the unstable countries until they got their acts together. Rather than having strong countries leaving.
I think rather than a Brexit, the EU should kick out the countries clearly bringing it down without contributing. Furthermore, until things get really bad for the countries in the EU, they won't get their act together.
Everyone experiences a similar situation like that in their daily lives. However, she made the choice to jump. Life was clearly not fair to her, but the bad day she had, was due to chaos and chance, not intent.
The reality is that chaos doesn't pick sides, thus, it cannot be unfair. The guy shouldn't have thrown gum off the roof, so he committed a crime of negligence and I believe she would be in the right to charge him if she could prove it, however, he didn't mean to hurt the girl. Furthermore, she chose to walk away.
The guys laughing were pricks and that is unacceptable. However, they weren't trying to hurt her specifically. They would have laughed at anyone.
Her getting fired, well, unfortunate, however, everyone gets fired. I have even, because of company politics in a lot of cases.
It was the girl's choice to get drunk, it was the girls choice to jump. She could have done a lot of things. The events were due to chaos, and unfortunately, it was just a bad day for her. Chaos isn't necessarily fair, but then again, since I don't believe in god, it doesn't pick sides either.
You can't pick how you look, how much money you were born into, your genetics, or anything else ... sometimes, the world is just screwed up.
You are forgetting that Hilter was totally biased and he treated different groups of people differently to an extreme degree based on race and religious beliefs. So he might have been more liberal towards his chosen people, but to all others, he was a demon. A silver tongued demon.
Obama is NOT a failure.
The reality is that any war is taxing on countries economy, and the war is still going on. Any lag in the economy is a indirect result of the war. He has accomplished a lot during his presidency and made a lot of good choices. However, now that his team is breaking off, he is loosing power for change.
I think that the younger more educated generation will clearly support Hillary. However, the majority of American voters are not more educated and humanitarian. Instead they are old, racist, and biased and consequently, they will vote for Trump. Not because Trump is racist and biased, but because that is the PR image that the media has given him.
Since the younger generation is more liberal, they will side with Hillary. Not because she is more liberal, but because that is the feeling you get from her because of her political affiliations.
You have to remember, the average voter doesn't really do their research.
Having a person who is clearly disrespectful as the leader of a country doesn't reflect good on America's reputation. Furthermore, this will be used by other countries who want to go to war against America. He might have good negotiators and be willing to bully other countries into giving him what he wants. However, in the long term, this may cause ill will and resentment. But he will solve problems at the end of the day. Furthermore, Trump will cause tons of social issues.
Hillary however, will serve as a role model for woman all throughout America. She will be taken advantage of if she doesn't have resolve. She is a strong woman however, she stood by Bill Clinton even when he went through shit and hazing. However, what I've noticed is that a lot of white woman are a source of racism, so I'd prefer the first female president to have an interracial marriage. Hillary doesn't have a track record of success throughout her life, however, she is a fighter.
I think that Trump will take action (good or bad). Why? Because he isn't afraid to make mistakes. I think Hillary will try and equalize things and draw out conflicts, however, nothing will change much with her.
Yes. I believe that if a child is openly being disrespectful and destructive and will not respond to reason, disciplining them (calm public discipline) should be allowed to stop the behavior. For example, if the child is being violent/rude, or they are being opening disrespectful and destructive of other people's property. The same applies to grown people in my opinion.
No.
For people who have committed crimes beyond a reasonable doubt like:
1) hard drug dealers,
2) rapists,
3) dangerous stalkers
4) murderers (who kill without a reason)
5) violent gangsters
6) hate crimes/hazers
7) corruption (stealing from the public, putting money ahead of safety)
8) decisions based on bias
Kill them. History has shown that simple talk doesn't work. People will lie and defend their bad actions and blame it on the victims. Keeping these criminals alive will increase tax rates and costs to the general public, increase the money that goes to lawyers, increase the likelihood of them escaping, fan groups etc ...
A sped up death penalty will fix all this. Furthermore, a quick death is more humanitarian than imprisoning bad men. Of course, the people in jail should have a choice.
