Should all African Americans that can show roots in the u.s. for at least 100 years be given 1 million dollars if they agree to leave the united states and renounce their citizenship?  

Should the united states Government that paid reparations to other nations pay reparations to African Americans that do not like it here and want to build a new life in Africa?  

The united states is white privilege driven. Whites are privileged in the united states to the point of nausea .   Whats your take it....is there?

Final Score:

Efficiency:     80%

Arguments: 8051

Debates:     1000

Accomplishments:

Most Points

Most Persuasive

Most Provocative

Most Outspoken

Most Creative

Icon / Avatar / Pictures used:

I think about the Questions a child will eventually ask at a certain age like the birds and the bees and the purpose of having a sexual relationship. How he or she was born, puberty and getting married. I'm not so sure it's a healthy idea to have same sex couples teaching children about life.  Gay couples are using sarrogate mothers carry their child and then they raise the child but at some point in the childs life he or she will ask Questions. Like why did you bring me here like this?

So...is it emotionally healthy to allow these situations to occur? And should the mental and emotional future of the child be considered in the discussion?

Would a benevolent God, knowing that the majority of people in the world would never be exposed to the correct 'Religion' or 'Denomination' send people to hell based on that fact, or is it incompatible with benevolence?

Whether or not you answer in the affirmative or the negative, does this in your opinion create a lottery situation in which some people are given greatly increased chances of acheiving salvation and heaven based on random factors? While others are given a greatly decreased, if any, chance to receieve salvation and heaven?

If you answer in the negative [He would send them to hell] how do you reconcile the situation in which someone may, for instance, live all their lives in a radical, 'heathen' country where information of the 'true' [whatever it may be] religion is not allowed?

Does the use of elearning in Early Childhood Education encourage the development of skills for lifelong learning in young children?

For example, it is considered compassionate, by a lot of people, to have bilingual education.  But I consider that racist.  What the compassionate crowd is saying is that the poor minority students are too stupid to learn the English language through immersion (the way my sister and I learned it).

It is easy to see the racist aspect of it when you consider that there are no special education for the children of other migrant groups.  Presumably they are language geniuses that do not require special education.  But the children of Spanish speaking individuals are apparently not so bright and thus require special education.

matthew 5:17-18

This in short tells us that all laws are correct, indefinately correct. Therefore the laws in the Old Testament are correct.

 Deuteronomy 21:21
'All the men of the town must then stone him to death. You must banish this evil from among you.'

Whos better?

The whole purpose behind his ultra-conservative shows are to make conservatives look bad!

RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE AND OTHER VIEWS

Does anyone out there know that Christmas, easter, halloween, and valentines day are all pagan holiday? My question is, why do Christians adopt these pagan beliefs and call them "worshipping/giving thanks to God"...its more like "worshipping (pagan) gods"

If you don't believe me check these out:

www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/holidays2.htm

www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/Psychology/.../celeb.htm

Interesting discussion I got into today

Say we lived in a Laissez faire economy, and all competition was gone due to Walmart taking over and selling literally everything (including oil). Would a company this large be able to afford to exploit and underpay its workers? Would the workers have a way of beating the business economically?

In addition to the amendments currently in the Consitution (can be debated as well), which of the following should also have been included:

1810: No U.S. citizen shall accept a foreign title of nobility.

1861: The institution of slavery shall not be declared unlawful.

1876: Religious leaders are forbidden to occupy government office and denied all federal funding

1876: The Senate shall be abolished.

1878: The offices of the President shall be abolished and replaced with an executive Council of Three.

1893: The nation shall hereafter be known as the United States of the Earth.

1893: The Army and the Navy shall be abolished.

1894: The Constitution shall hereby acknowledge God and Jesus Christ as the supreme authorities in the affairs of man.

1912: Marriage between certain of the races shall be prohibited.

1916: All acts of war shall be put to a national vote. All those affirming [voting "yes"] shall be registered as a volunteer for service in the United States Armed Forces

1938: Drunkenness in the United States and all the territories is forbidden.

1947: Individual income shall be taxed at a rate no greater than 25 percent.

1948: The right of citizens to voluntarily segregate themselves from others shall not be denied.

1971: All citizens have an inalienable right to an unpolluted environment.

So debate these proposed amendments (proposed means that 2/3 of the House or Senate voted for a discussion, but was incapable of earning the required 3/4 for ratification) on their utility, effects, and whether or not it/they should have passed.

http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local-beat/Council-Meetings-to-Begin-with-Muslim-Prayers-102387499.html