I have been on-and-off in a homosexual relationship for the last few years. A few years ago I was an au pair and I went to visit them recently. The kid I used to look after was asking me when I am going to get married and how many girlfriends I've had. After a lot of pestering I eventually just said "maybe I will just marry [the name of the guy I've had relations with]". Would you habe done the same? What is the appropriate age?
Here a lie, there a lie, everywhere a lie lie.....http://nypost.com/2017/09/19/wiretaps-may-prove-trump-right-and-thats-absolutely-terrifying/http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/18/politics/paul-manafort-government-wiretapped-fisa-russians/index.htmlhttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/19/trump-vindicated-manafort-wiretapping-report-lends-credence-to-claim.html
To all the anti Christian bigots on this site, ask yourself why you so dislike Christians.
Any intelligent person should see the different value systems between true Christians and non Christians. Even if you are Atheist, you would see the obvious and understand that the self centered Godless cost you billions more in Goverment subsidies. The selfish promiscuous irresponsible lifestyles of non believers is truly destroying this nation. Our families are in shambles and a huge debt burden to all tax paying Americans.Rather than constantly ridiculing and insulting Christians, you should have respect for their moral values, their commitment to family, their hard work ethics and pride of raising their families without believing they are entitled to other's money.But no, bigots despise Christians for one reason and one reason alone. We make you feel bad about your insecure lives. We are the proof that your selfish lifestyles are a personal choice rather than a, we are all screwed up, so it's not our fault mentality. The moral values spoken to in the New testament Bible shines a light on your personal choices in life, and you hate that fact.Are Christians perfect? No, they also fall into sin, but they have a moral code and foundation that helps them to always strive for a better life, a moral responsible life.Your lies of how Christians want to force moral laws on you is a complete joke. You must lie and distort what Christians stand for because you have no other excuses for your own immoral irresponsible choices in life. Newsflash, we don't care how you live your lives as long as you do not try to twist our Christian faith, nor indoctrinate our children to your politcal correct anti God ideology.Spare me your statistics of how 80% of Americans identify as Christians, so therefore they are just as irresponsible as everyone else. Yes most Americans do identify as Christian, but that is the extent of their Christian walk. The majority could not care less what the Bible says about their lifestyles. It means nothing to them. I'm speaking to the true Christians who do care what their faith teaches and do their best to live by it.So again, I ask you to look within yourself and see the truth to why you have so much bigotted hatred for what your judgemental intolerance calls those evil fundamentalist Bible beliving Christains. They are not hurting you in the least.They are actually saving you billions by being the strong families supporting their own children, paying taxes, lifting up responsibility, and holding together what's left of our nation's moral foundation. Without our nation's Christian heritage, we would have long ago collapsed. Recognise that fact and stop your bigotted judgemental dislike for them. They have every right to their beliefs as written, not how you wish it were written.
Hillary Clinton says women only voted for Trump because their Husbands told them to!
Failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton claimed this weekend that she lost the election because women in particular white women caved to pressure from the men in their life and voted for Trump. The quintessential modern feminist Clinton says women were too scared to stand up to their husbands, boyfriends, and fathers, who told them to vote Republican, and since, clearly, women have no agency or ability to think for themselves, they listened. But lest you think Clinton's ire falls only on those dastardly oppressed Republican women who live under the thumb of domineering fathers and partners she extends blame to female Bernie Sanders supporters who she says were cowed into supporting the Progressive 70 year old by online bullies.The Patron Saint of Feminism blames Women for her Loss and the Blame Tour continues !But hey, it's much easier to blame everyone but yourself, right? Feminism!
Taste in art aside, do you believe that some artists push their artistic interpretations too far? Or do you think that is the point to it. Another question would be, do you think some people call themselves artists and their work art as a way to get around doing something distasteful or shocking?Examples of controversial art are:https://news.artnet.com/exhibitions/top-10-controversial-art-projects-563213and of course Trumps severed head.
Now I will disclose that I wish to take in a small amount of Ven Raffs, to help support them, but I want to here what all of you think, should we. If you don't know what is going on, Venezuela is under an oppressive dictatorship and is undergoing basically a civil war and famine. So what do you think?
Is CreateDebate the best debate site, or is another.. Check out the sites below, and make your best arguments..
Argumentum - http://apps.facebook.com/argumentum/ (Facebook App) or http://arg.umentum.com/
Debate.org - http://debate.org/
Riledup - http://www.riledup.com/
WhereIStand - http://www.whereistand.com/
Many theists claim that it's logical to believe in a god (or gods), while most atheists would suggest that atheism is consistent with the evidence (or lack of evidence), making it the more rational and logical position.
Out of all the channels available on YouTube for entertainment, politics, news, education etc. which is your favorite? You may list several, particularly if you have different favorites in different categories.
Bernie Sanders is confused on Medicaid for all now imagine that !
Sen. Bernie Sanders and his progressive pals may be pushing a "Medicare-For-All" bill as the only solution to the Affordable Care Act's abysmal effect on the health care system, but back in 1987, the Vermont Senator was a lot more honest about what his universal health care plan would cost Americans: a lot.But it's not clear who will pay for the "free" healthcare Bernie promises.Let's hear this with feeling there Barney !“One of the points that we understand and I think was reinforced when we went to Canada,” Sanders told Dr. Miltion Terris, “Number one, you want to guarantee that all people have access to healthcare as you do in Canada.”"I think what we understand is that unless we change the funding system and the control mechanism in this country to do that,” he said. “For example, if we expanded Medicaid [to] everybody. Give everybody a Medicaid card – we would be spending such an astronomical sum of money that, you know, we would bankrupt the nation.”What does he think will happen...now? That in the last thirty years, we've magically developed a way to pay for the program out of thin air? That unicorn is probably only visible to Bernie Sanders.
Hobby Lobby slammed by a Leftist for "Racist Display of Raw Cotton"
A woman in Texas says she was triggered by a "racist" Hobby Lobby floral display — because it featured raw cotton.The woman, Daniell Rider, made a hysterical post to Hobby Lobby's corporate Facebook page, excoriating the craft store chain for it's silk floral department clearance section, which featured a few sprigs of raw cotton in glass vases, marked down from $29.99 each to $15.00. It wasn't the price that freaked her out, however — it was the overt racism."This decor is WRONG on SO many levels. There is nothing decorative about raw cotton … A commodity which was gained at the expense of African-American slaves. A little sensitivity goes a long way. PLEASE REMOVE THIS ‘décor,'" Rider wrote. Wonder if the Leftist Daniell Rider has consumed any products made with cotton lately ?The Lunacy of the American Left continues !
There hasn't always been a divide between science and morality or science and religion. But now it can be hard to tell how far science should go in finding answers. Can there be a co-existence between the two? Especially when personal belief may make a person lean towards believing morality should draw a line in how far a scientist should go for scientific study?
I just watched the video and did a very brief review of the facts provided by Newsweek.First; a vehicle is a lethal weapon. One which Smith (the suspect) had already illustrated he was willing to use recklessly. After he crashed into a marked police squad car, he turned and nearly ran over two police officers in an attempt to escape. This reckless behavior caused Stockley to fire his weapon multiple times before the chase ever ensued. This lawful lethal force is not in question.Second; during the chase, Stockley can be heard (if barely) saying "going to kill this (expletive), don't you know it." according to court documents. It cannot be distinguished if he said I, we, they, or anything else. It cannot be determined that this is a statement of intent rather than a statement of apprehension for what happens at the end of the chase. Given Stockley's behavior at the end of the chase, the latter may be inferred since...Third; At the end of the chase Stockley approaches the vehicle and is seen on video talking to Smith through the car window. He doesn't go in guns blazing, he didn't even approach with his gun actually drawn. According to Stockley, the talk was him giving commands to Smith who was busy reaching around inside his car and failing to comply. This reaching around caused Stockley to draw his weapon. When Stockley observed Smiths demeanor change, he believed it was due to him locating the gun that Stockley was afraid he had. This is when Stockely shot and killed Smith. Later, a gun was located between the front seat and the center consol by Stockley who ejected the chambered round rendering the gun safe and placed them on the front seat. Fourth; the burden of proof lies with the prosecution. Stockely must be shown to have committed murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Fifth; I forgot to mention the skin color of the persons involved. That's because bullets aren't racist.