I know Libprolifer doesn't really understand what she says most of the time but I wonder if other prolifers share her opinion. It is hypocritical for someone that is prolife to say they respect a womans freedom of belief that the fetus is not a life / is a life but can be killed / is a malvolent parasite etc etc?
When one cuts through all the BS, it is obvious that scientists have no idea how life began. They have nothing but some stories that they made up. That's it. They make the assumption that abiogenesis is correct simply because life exists. This is not science. It's nothing but wishful thinking. So. Where is this evidence? I must have missed it.
I only met this women yesterday and she is stalking me but she accuses me of copying her debates when she is the one copying mine. I don't have to stand for this.
I posted this: http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/Do_prolifers_respect_women_s_freedom_of_belief
and she immediately posted this: http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/Does_the_proabortion_activists_respect_the_unborn_child_s_right_to_choose
Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Same-Sex Marriage?
This Tuesday will mark the beginning of arguments for a case that many believe will end with the Supreme Court recognizing a right to same sex marriage akin to the recognized civil right for heterosexual marriage. My question is two fold: Do you believe that the Equal Protections and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution apply to marriage (recognized as a civil right beginning in Loving v. Virginia and reaffirmed many times), and if not why? Additionally, with Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomoyor and Kagan almost certainly rulling for, and Thomas, Alito and Scalia almost certainly ruling against, do you believe that Kennedy and Robberts will vote for or against, and why?http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/26/us-usa-court-gaymarriage-justices-idUSKBN0NH0GE20150426
I don't even know her and she is calling me a doll and send me a message that she is my enemy. :( I'm new here but don't think I will be staying long with this cyber bullying. It is torture and against my rights.
Hillary and Dem's want to buy more votes with free college while our debt is 18 TRILLION!
The Democrat party has truly been taken over by extremists who are corrupt politicians who constantly want to buy votes with our tax dollars. I ask you, are all Democrats complete morons or do a few of them have any common sesne at all?
These fools pushing this hogwash are using the same lies as politicians have been saying for decades. They say we should spend more on free College to get all these graduates to grow the economy and then the added tax revenue will cut our debt. LIE, TOTAL LIE! IT NEVER HAPPENS! OUR NATIONAL DEBT NEVER COMES DOWN AFTER A RECOVERY IN OUR ECONOMY! THEY ALWAYS SPEND THE ADDED REVENUE AND NEVER PUT IT TOWARDS THE DEBT! IT ALWAYS KEEPS GOING UP!
Who do you think will pay for free College? THE MIDDLE CLASS AS ALWAYS! Democrats will NEVER raise taxes on lower income people to pay for their free College and the Rich can find ways round the higher taxes.
This is how Democrats spin it to middle class Americans...... they will say they care about the middle class and will help you out with free community College, all while we raise your taxes to do so. How about the middle class that have no kids or they have kids who do not want to go to College? With Democrats it is always TARGETED tax cuts, or subsidies for the certain few who might vote for them.
If they ever taxed ALL Americans who work to pay for these social programs, you would hear a loud voice screaming ...NO FREE COLLEGE!
If they had a decent honest bone in their body they would be finding ways to cut the cost of College rather than CONSTANTLY raising taxes, or making it so easy to take on huge College loan debt, or now trying to give free college which allows Colleges to keep raising tuitions. It's insanity and is done purely for political reasons. Our nation is dieing from corrupt Democrats who refuse to cut spending.
Are the Republicans perfect? No, Bush did not care about cutting spending but he is not the Repubican party. They are the party that at least tries to cut spending, keeps trying to get balanced budget amendments started only to have Democrats tell them it is dead on arrival. The GOP allowed military defense cuts but the Democrats refused to cut any social program spending. The GOP does not try to spend more to buy votes!
It is obvious which party spends and taxes more and to deny so wastes our time. When will the adult intelligent voters start screaming enough is enough? It won't happen from Democrats. They spend all their time worrying about Gay marriage, Global warming, buying votes, going after illegal immigrant votes, taking our guns, etc.
STOP THE SPENDING!
Dana has banned 3 people from the other debate in as many minutes. If you want to debate it without fear if getting banned feel free. Not that you would want to as it is a done to death topic anyway..
Currently, a portion of our taxes goes towards funding welfare. Those people do not work (they just collect free money) and that brings the unemployment numbers up. However, if our individual share of welfare funding went into our own individual trust and we gave welfare recipients a bank account number that identified it as belonging to a welfare recipient, then individuals could hire welfare recipients and pay them from the funds in their trust. Once those funds run out, you can't hire any more welfare recipients. Any money in the trust that is not spend by the end of the year, goes to the welfare recipients as free money. This would get welfare recipients to perform actual services/work (bringing unemployment down) and get paid for doing said jobs. They would become contributing members of society and not a drain on society. We could still have minimum wage and maybe have specific wage assignments for certain jobs. Those who are physically unable to perform any work, could still get welfare.