This really explains a lot in reality. I read an article showing how marijuana affects the brain in negative ways, and here you are admitting you smoke a brain cell killer as a part of an addiction. Well, that explains why your posts are nonsensical on a regular basis. I might suggest that you stay off of public forums when you're high, but why? I want normal people to see the crap leftists type. It's the only reason the Republican Party has any chance of winning elections despite a media bent against them. People that think like you putting their every thought onto the Internet is what cancels out the media monopoly.
Yes. But no one could get Trump for having classified information that is declassified simply by him saying it was. Biden would be protected in the same way, but so would Trump. Seeing the left actually pointed this out years ago, doesn't that make them lying pieces of shit now?
None of that explains or even relates to Trump voters booing Trump. Watching you get schooled repeatedly with no ability to post a defense is pure entertainment, so keep up the good work of being unable to defend the Democrats' indefensable acts and behaviors.
Gas was 1990s prices, while unemployment was the lowest in 50 years with a high job participation rate attached. Trump didn't close businesseses down for years, the Democrats did, and no one disputes this. WTF are you talking about you fucking moron?
You could do all these things, and the right wing has
Show me an example of the current Republican Party from say 2000 to the present making anyone take an intelligence test, count gumballs in a globe, charge a poll tax, or putting signs up in black neughborhoods.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J059v14n0202?journalCode=wphs20
-----
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1968/12/19/hitlers-welfare-state/
-----
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3786221
-----
https://www.google.com/amp/s/reason.com/
-----
https://www.facinghistory.org/
-----
https://www.loc.gov/item/2005678660/
-----
-----
-----
Conservatives see the world as a more threatening place because their brains predispose them to being fearful
Which is the dominant characteristic in evolution neccessary for survival.
Species-specific defense reactions (SSDRs) or avoidance learning in nature is the specific tendency to avoid certain threats or stimuli, it is how animals survive in the wild.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear
Says it all.
Conservatives see the world as a more threatening place because their brains predispose them to being fearful
Which is the dominant characteristic in evolution neccessary for survival.
Species-specific defense reactions (SSDRs) or avoidance learning in nature is the specific tendency to avoid certain threats or stimuli, it is how animals survive in the wild.
Here was the libs argument when the Obama Presidency spent like a rich man's trophy wife.
"Also, keep in mind that Obama can't take any financial steps without Congress' approval. "
https://money.cnn.com/2016/10/19/news/
Growth is growth. Along with the Stock Market growth, we have the "record" National Debt Growth! Obama restarted the growth, kept it at a healthy, steady pace while he had the debt moving slowly downward.
Awesome. The magic formula to libs is Obama accumulates $10 trillion in debt, then curbs it at the end.
White House requests Congress rescind $15 billion in spending
Hitler-
The religions are all alike, no matter what they call themselves. They have no future—certainly none for the Germans. Fascism, if it likes, may come to terms with the Church. So shall I. Why not? That will not prevent me from tearing up Christianity root and branch, and annihilating it in Germany.
The Voice of Destruction (1940)p. 49
One is either a German or a Christian. You cannot be both... We don’t want people who keep one eye on the life in the hereafter. We need free men who feel and know that God is in themselves... Do you really believe the masses will ever be Christian again? Nonsense! Never again. That tale is finished… They will betray their God to us. They will betray anything for the sake of their miserable little jobs and incomes.
pp. 49-50
It is not Germany that will turn Bolshevistbut Bolshevism that will become a sort ofNational Socialist. Besides, there is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communist always will.... Our spirit is so strong, and the power of our magnificent movement to transform souls so elemental, that men are remodeled against their will... A social revolution would lend me new, unsuspected powers. I do not fear permeation with revolutionary Communist propaganda.
pp. 131-132
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/
It is now clear beyond all reasonable doubt that Hitler and his associates believed they were socialists, and that others, including democratic socialists, thought so too. The title of National Socialism was not hypocritical. The evidence before 1945 was more private than public, which is perhaps significant in itself. In public Hitler was always anti-Marxist, and in an age in which the Soviet Union was the only socialist state on earth, and with anti-Bolshevism a large part of his popular appeal, he may have been understandably reluctant to speak openly of his sources. His megalomania, in any case, would have prevented him from calling himself anyone's disciple. That led to an odd and paradoxical alliance between modern historians and the mind of a dead dictator. Many recent analysts have fastidiously refused to study the mind of Hitler; and they accept, as unquestioningly as many Nazis did in the 1930s, the slogan "Crusade against Marxism" as a summary of his views. An age in which fascism has become a term of abuse is unlikely to analyse it profoundly.
His private conversations, however, though they do not overturn his reputation as an anti-Communist, qualify it heavily. Hermann Rauschning, for example, a Danzig Nazi who knew Hitler before and after his accession to power in 1933, tells how in private Hitler acknowledged his profound debt to the Marxian tradition. "I have learned a great deal from Marxism" he once remarked, "as I do not hesitate to admit". He was proud of a knowledge of Marxist texts acquired in his student days before the First World War and later in a Bavarian prison, in 1924, after the failure of the Munich putsch. The trouble with Weimar Republic politicians, he told Otto Wagener at much the same time, was that "they had never even read Marx", implying that no one who had failed to read so important an author could even begin to understand the modern world; in consequence, he went on, they imagined that the October revolution in 1917 had been "a private Russian affair", whereas in fact it had changed the whole course of human history! His differences with the communists, he explained, were less ideological than tactical. German communists he had known before he took power, he told Rauschning, thought politics meant talking and writing. They were mere pamphleteers, whereas "I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun", adding revealingly that "the whole of National Socialism" was based on Marx.
https://www.independent.co.uk/