Free will says that we have the choice to choose the events in which we lead our lives but i think that is only part of the story. When someone has to make a choice, i agree that they have free will, they can choose left or right but i think it's the result that actually occurs is the weak link in the free will debate. Nobody can prove that the outcome was completely random. According to determinism, every natural event has a cause and making unrestricted choices is a natural event, therefore the result of the choice is predetermined, not a choice of free will. For example, if i were driving home and i had to turn left or right, then i have the choice to turn either way, free will, but i turn right because that is the way home. That choice was determined by the fact that my home was down that road and not the other and that was driving home.