But if you were to eat bread and drink wine in a non-religious setting, without observing rituals of Christianity, and without thinking about praising God whilst doing so, then it would NOT be holy communion, it would just be bread and evening drinks.
It was not "don't ask don't tell" for straight people. If a straight man let on to his buddy that he slept with a woman the night before, would he be discharged? No! Would a straight man have to pretend that his boyfriend was actually just his roommate? Of course not! DADT was excessively hard on gay men, for no reason other than the continuation of an outdated policy.
You are trying to tell me that you are supposedly educated enough to have studied anything in detail, and yet you still cannot differentiate between 'your' and 'you are'?
Yeah, I call fake.
If you wish to only drink bottled water, be my guest. You are only wasting your own money with your paranoia.
Three things; firstly, stop clogging the boards with repeatedly posting in order to bolster you side score.
Secondly, for the love of God learn to reply to an argument properly as opposed to just heading your post with their name, and finally, please, please proof read what you write. You are not helping yourself.
I think drinking bottled water is one of the most ridiculous things people regualy do, however, it is up to the consumer to make their own idiotic decisions. Why should we ban something people buy and therefore stimulates the economy? Sure, it's a mostly stupid product, but so are a lot of things.
No, of course not, Firstly, where do you draw the "dangerous" line? Do you draw it at parkour, or do you draw it at football or rugby?
Are they talking about banning students from doing things outside school, or in it? If it is outside school, then they have no right to interfere. For instance, what if a child's father wind surfs, and they have also done so since a young age? Should they be stopped from doing so because the school says so?
The propersition is ludicrous.