CreateDebate


SeanODonnell's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of SeanODonnell's arguments, looking across every debate.
4 points

But by having places like McDonalds, It puts real farms out of buisness.

6 points

Industrially produced food appears to be inexpensive, but the pricetag doesn’t reflect the actual costs that we taxpayers bear. Factory farms pollute communities and adversely affect public health, thereby increasing medical costs for those living near such farms costs that are often shouldered by public budgets. Taxpayers fund government subsidies, which go primarily to large industrial farms. Jobs are lost and wages driven down, as corporate consolidation bankrupts small businesses and factory farms pay unethically low wages for dangerous, undesirable work.

2 points

You hypocrite, Ive seen you drink from a water bottle. So they for your argument is still invalid.

3 points

And what id the kids are 13 or younger? Or what if the kid is a newborn baby? Im pretty sure babies cant work.

5 points

It may be the same as tap but it helps people get money to feed their families.

6 points

Water bottles should not be banned because water is a key essential of life, it can be a source of power and energy. Even though the world is about 70% water and only 1% is drinkable. If the world needed water so badly, our top scientist could just find away to make all water drinkable. If water bottles get banned a lot of people will lose there jobs, and would push the United States more into an economic problem. Sure taking water and making water bottles ruin thousands of lives, but it saves millions. If people are complaining about the bottles destroying the environment, then they should recycle more and or get other people to recycle. If water bottles are no better than tap why does it matter? The only difference is your paying, which the money goes to works to feed there families.

http://www.filtersfast.com/articles/Ban-bottled-water.php



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]