According to evidence I found, the holocaust didn't happen. It was exaggerated and never on the nazi agenda. Basically holocaust denail excuses. The deaths of jews were from starvation and disease caused by bombings on railroads by the allies preventing delivery of supplies. The camps were quite fair. http://ihr.org/leaflets/libcamps.shtml http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/
This is the evidence I found. Read it all please though it is quite long.
According to new evidemce I found, the concentration camps weren't cruel or for murder. http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/
Well he was a good man and did a lot of good for Germany. He also heavily influenced society. Since history is written by the victors, the allies demonetized him. Why not Stalin, America, Rome, or Egypt? Or even themselves, as the allies committed several war crimes.
Yes, are you sure your not a jew? (This is filler- filler filler fileer filler filler filler filler.)
When did I say that? The jews pretty much ruined his life and the treaty of versailles was very unfair, this filled him with anger and hate. So hee persecuted them. No one knows why exactly he hated jews, but if we did, we may find it is justified or fair pherhaps. But we don't know.
No, I support hitler and admire, I don't support several of there ideas. I support homosexuality, I respect jews as strong people, I don't hate blacks, and a few other stuff. I just like hitler and support him because he did a lot of great things for germany, whereas the jewish controlled media and the allies demonized him just for challenging their authority.
No, I support hitler and admire, I don't support several of there ideas. I support homosexuality, I respect jews as strong people, I don't hate blacks, and a few other stuff. I just like hitler and support him because he did a lot of great things for germany, whereas the jewish controlled media and the allies demonized him just for challenging their authority.
I did not forget. I argued supporting hitler, so it would be irrelevent to include that. No leader is perfect. The jews for some reason kept ruining his life (I.e. failing to save his mom, insulting his art, rejecting him from an art school, etc. Coincidence?) Plus they controlled the economy and failed to save the german economy, forcing him to become an orphan, ruining his beloved economy. He was into family values and therefor killed homos and criminals.
How was hitler "far more evil?" I don't know where you got this jewish propganda from, but he wasn't evil. He rebuilt the german economy, enforced family values, made groups for people to feel like they belong, was very kind and charismatic, helped the german people, undid the damage the allies had done and removed their corruption (e.g. treaty of varsailles) from germania, and loved his people with all his heart. Kindness, compassion, pity, helping, saving, hero, patriot, family man, intllegent, do these sound like the qualities of an evil doer?
Bush was a terrorist. He declared war on iraq for his own selfish reasons, attacked, mistreated, and disrespected muslims. He ruined the peace and order saddam maintained and helped out the groups he liked. He caused the distability in the middle east and had a DUI. He aslo hated allah. He didn't not believe in him, he hated him. Does that sound less evil than hitler?
No you shouldn't have said uh, I don't know exactly. You should've done research for your side to be able to prove and defend your arguments. You should always do research, then plan your argument, then argue.
What the fuck are you saying. D Indian. If you are Indian, this proves that India will lead the world to bankruptcy.
Uh, I don't know
You dumbass! You came to a debate not knowing how to respond or not knowing something! You are always supposed to be prepared! The fact that you didn't know how many people died in WWII and iraq compared to gthe votes bush received makes it harder to agree with such a bad debater.
iraq didn't have to happen
Exactly, bush wanted it to happen and look what happened! WWII had to happen. The treaty of versailles was rude and insulting to the german people, they lost much of their initial land, and the german economy almost imploaded. The allies were the cause of world war 2, but hitler was influenced to start it via domino effect.
way more jewish people died in WWII than iraqis
This I can't deny, but I never said more iraqis died, so that is irrelevent. Also, the death toll for WWII has to be a lot. It was a world war, though iraq was the strong picking on a weak country for oil.
you can't kill someone for being an idiot
True, but this debate is asking who would you kill I was only coneying my opinion. If you diasgree with the topic, then leave. And killingg the people who voted for him would be cruel, unnecesarry, and against democracy you communist.
there is no comparison
Agreed. Hitler was person of the year, he rebuilt the german economy, converted war torn germany to military and economic superpower, brought peace and order, improved german citizens lives, was responsible for research and many influences on american achievements (I.e. rocket technology), was loved by all germans, pretty much founded modern technology, and much more. Bush merely got oil for his company, ruined the economy, and was hated by many. You are right, there is no comparison. You also made an argument based on 1 small fact and make Das Furher sound better than bush.
Give me 5 things we will gain by killing off hitler, how society would improve without nazi research, and 5 reasons hitler was bad. Then give me 5 reasons bush was better than hitler and 5 achievements and how society improved under bush. If you manage to support your sorry, crappy, unsupported excuse for a counter argument, I will lay down my argument.
True. He also helped the german people and pursuaded them with the pen, not the sword. They did win by majority. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Listen, hitler was not selfish! He cared about germany more than anything. He worked hard and did what he did for Germany and the people. he never wanted to rule the world. He fought wwii in retaliation since the selfish french and english declared war on him. Read about hitlers achievments and find 1 thing that didn't help the germans that he did. Bush also killed people without cause- unless greed and oil are a cause. He ruined the economy, persecuted iraqis, and seized their oil! Hitler had a reason, hitler helped people.
How would you save millions?
Hitler saved the german economy, prevented the spread of communism, and made many important achievements. Killing bush, however, will save many iraqis and preserve the american economy and kill off a major terrorist. http://tv.globalresearch.ca/2012/10/
He cut taxes
And ruined the economy.
He crated more jobs
He created jobs by attacking the middle east with no logical or legal reason. He did it for oil for his company
getting revenge for 9-11
http://m.guardiannews.
gave many corptations what they needed to suceed
Read the first argument.
Therfore, your argument is very weak founded and contains no evidence or logic whatsoever.
He cut taxes
And ruined the economy.
He crated more jobs
He created jobs by attacking the middle east with no logical or legal reason. He did it for oil for his company
getting revenge for 9-11
http://m.guardiannews.
gave many corptations what they needed to suceed
Read the first argument.
Therfore, your argument is very weak founded and contains no evidence or logic whatsoever.
http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/
According to fbi and the efenition, he is a terrorist. He ruined the economy, mistreated muslims, declared war ONLY for iraqi oil, has a dui and awol. He is worse than hitler. Hitler saved the german economy and didn't have a dui.
Yes. According to the fbi defenition of terrorist, bush is a criminal. http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/
Also, he went to war with the middle east for oil. He is worse than hitler.
Wars caused by christians
Christians are people, which proves my point.
