CreateDebate


Madisonheft's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Madisonheft's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

I do think ASU took advantage of the native's generosity and poor education somewhat but I am leaning more towards the schools side. The school did in fact give a very broad explanation of what they wanted to do with the natives DNA. They signed a broad consent that said the research was to “study the causes of behavioral/medical disorders.” The article also stated that the natives were allowed to ask questions but none of them really questioned the specific of this research. The researchers slightly abused the generosity and poor education to their favor but I think the school was not trying to harm them in any way. They were just taking research to the next level and applying it to other aspects.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]