CreateDebate


Ngcaijun's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of Ngcaijun's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

The LON did their best in disarmament.Hitler's aim was to get back what Germany lost in WW1.LON alone was in no control to stop Hitler.Besides,the LON has already many responsibilty in maintain peace even in other countries.It's not possible to stop Hitler.Therefore,WW2's start was because of Hitler.If there something else had to be accountable for the start of war,it should be the countries that did not cooperate with the LON

1 point

Hitler should be held accountable for WW2.Hitler broke the terms of the Treaty of Versailles by placing troops on rhine land.His invasion on Poland was an immediate trigger to start WW2.He forced britain and france,who were allies with Poland to declare war on germany.He invaded Poland because the negotiation did not go in his way.However,invading Poland was definitely unecessary.He could have choose to continue negotiating instead of using violence.Therefore,Hitler should be held accountable for the war.

Caijun and priscilla

1 point

Hitler should be held accountable for WW2.Hitler broke the terms of the Treaty of Versailles by placing troops on rhine land.His invasion on Poland was an immediate trigger to start WW2.He forced britain and france,who were allies with Poland to declare war on germany.He invaded Poland because the negotiation did not go in his way.However,invading Poland was definitely unecessary.He could have choose to continue negotiating instead of using violence.Therefore,Hitler should be held accountable for the war



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]