CreateDebate


Debate Info

9
14
Makes sense Mini Hitler
Debate Score:23
Arguments:25
Total Votes:30
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Makes sense (9)
 
 Mini Hitler (11)

Debate Creator

Nomenclature(1174) pic



For Those Who Don't Know Yet: The Lying Jew Known As @Amarel Is Also @xMathFanx

This guy needs to be banned for the simple reason that he isn't interested in honest debate. He writes massive long walls of complete and total bullshit in which he demonstrably and purposefully lies as much as he possibly can. I am highly suspicious that he may be a paid shill of some kind.

To give you all a fine example, yesterday he mistakenly thought Socrates had written "The Republic" and that the book had been written about fascism (it was written in 380 BC!!). Under his @xMathFanx account, he then used these errors (the second of which was a deliberate lie) to write a 6,000 word defence of fascism. You can find the thread here:-

http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/Fascism_is_Good_Please_read_my_argument

Shortly after that I realised, simply from comparing the writing styles, that @xMathFanx and the poster who opened the above thread under the pseudonym @Fascism, are actually the same person. The @xMathFanx account did not reply to me, but the @Fascism account did, and again he tried to lie about the facts. I corrected him again and left the thread.

Then, this morning, when I checked my messages, there were more long, personal attacks from xMathFanx in which he called me stupid over and over and over again.

I am 100 percent certain that the @xMathFanx and @Fascism accounts both belong to @Amarel. Anybody who converses with @Amarel for more than five minutes knows that he is a political fascist, and I find it incredibly unlikely that two more political fascists with exactly the same writing style as his are using this site to promote fascism.

Another thing to remember is that @Amarel is a Hebrew and English is not his first language. He uses an online thesaurus to try to disguise this by deliberately complicating his language, but frequently he makes extremely basic grammatical errors which make it obvious what he is doing. The posts of @xMathFanx are filled with these same glaring grammatical inconsistencies.

I truly believe this person may be a paid shill and I will explain why. Many people (myself included) are stubborn in their politics and many people will exaggerate or stretch reality in defence of them. But what @Amarel does is much different. He literally turns the truth upside down in much the same way that Hitler did. That is, he will do something wrong, and then accuse you of it in the next breath. He is fully aware that he is lying and he does it anyway in order to elicit emotional reactions which he then uses to falsely justify his vicious attacks against people.

In summary. It isn't that this guy is stupid or ignorant. He is a purposeful and deliberate liar.


Makes sense

Side Score: 9
VS.

Mini Hitler

Side Score: 14
Amarel(2375) Banned
1 point

I am highly suspicious that he may be a paid shill of some kind

How much do you suppose I am paid?

Side: Makes sense
0 points

How much do you suppose I am paid?

Judging by your massive word count on a plethora of different accounts, far too much.

Side: Mini Hitler
Amarel(2375) Clarified Banned
1 point

How much would you guess ?

Side: Makes sense
1 point

Hello N:

You're NOT gonna enroll me into your argument by using antisemitic slurs.. It just ain't happening.. Libs WIN arguments by using FACTS, LOGIC and a CALM demeanor... You think you win by hurling insults.. That's a very right wing thing to do..

excon

Side: Makes sense
1 point

You're NOT gonna enroll me into your argument by using antisemitic slurs.

Hi Con.

Please don't be silly. Calling someone a "lying Jew" is not an "antisemitic slur". A liar is someone who tells lies and a Jew is someone who subscribes to Judaism. Given that most dictionaries describe Jewish people as Jews then these anti-Semitic slurs seem to really be taking off, do they not?

Side: Mini Hitler

@FactMachine.

I am guessing you did not know this.

Now you know this.

Side: Mini Hitler
1 point

@Nomenclature.

To give you all a fine example, yesterday he mistakenly thought Socrates had written "The Republic" and that the book had been written about fascism (it was written in 380 BC!!). Under his @xMathFanx account, he then used these errors (the second of which was a deliberate lie) to write a 6,000 word defence of fascism. You can find the thread here:-

http://www.createdebate.com/debate/show/ Fascism isGoodPleasereadmyargument

Completely wrong, as usual. I would highly encourage anyone to read my posts on that thread as it will shine light on Nomenclatures dishonest "debate" tactics greatly.

First, I constantly (correctly) referred to The Republic as Plato's Republic since Plato is the author. Socrates is the main figure speaking in the book, as it is with most of Plato's work.

Second, the society that Socrates constructs in The Republic is most aptly described as Fascist/quasi-Fascist and this is not my original idea but rather is a prevalent view amongst "schools" of Professional Philosophers (read the literature, I already referred you to one eminent professional in the field--Bertrand Russell).

Third, I did not endorse The Republic and specifically stated that I am coming from the opposing position in most cases with regard to the text.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nom, your smear campaigns are pathetic..

Side: Mini Hitler
1 point

Completely wrong, as usual. I would highly encourage anyone to read my posts on that thread

Translation: now that I have edited them in order to try to cover my tracks, like the laughable comic book villain I am.

First, I constantly (correctly) referred to The Republic as Plato's Republic

This is exactly how I know you have edited your posts after the fact. Unfortunately for you, you will not have been able to edit mine, or the direct quote I used to debunk you:-

What is so interesting about The Republic is that Socrates is an "elite" liberal intellectual constructing this society and arguing that it is the "Ideally Just" society, while in modern times, people typically associate far-right neo-con types with those who are most sympathetic to fascism/quasi-fascism. One will find that this is not necessarily the case or correct distinction (i.e. it is not the case that the "far-right" are the only ones sympathetic to fascism and that "liberals" or parts of the left want nothing to do with it).

Socrates was dead when Plato wrote The Republic. Neither is The Republic a book about fascism. You springboarded from talking about The Republic to talking about fascism, and then argued The Republic was a book about politics which concludes that Liberals are fascists.

You clearly are just a massive lying Jew, aren't you? You are a lying fascist Jew who is trying to confuse and disorient people about the nature and political position of fascism. Fascism is a far right political doctrine and it has always been a far right political doctrine.

Side: Makes sense
Amarel(2375) Clarified Banned
1 point

Socrates is the main figure speaking in the book

I almost "corrected" you on your false attribution of authorship to Socrates, but then realized that he is the main character.

Side: Makes sense
xMathFanx(673) Clarified Banned
1 point

@Amarel.

I almost "corrected" you on your false attribution of authorship to Socrates, but then realized that he is the main character

I didn not false attribute authorship or anything i stated about the Republic.

Have you read The Republic (as i have)?..

Side: Makes sense
1 point

I almost "corrected" you on your false attribution of authorship to Socrates, but then realized that he is the main character.

The Republic is not a work of fiction and hence it contains no characters or plot. The only connection between Socrates and The Republic is that Socrates once taught Plato.

Also, stop writing posts to yourself to try to cover up your own lies. It's stupid.

Side: Makes sense
1 point

Shortly after that I realised, simply from comparing the writing styles, that @xMathFanx and the poster who opened the above thread under the pseudonym @Fascism, are actually the same person. The @xMathFanx account did not reply to me, but the @Fascism account did, and again he tried to lie about the facts. I corrected him again and left the thread.

Yet another Conspiracy Theory from the Crackpot..

Side: Mini Hitler
0 points

Yet another Conspiracy Theory from the Crackpot..

How is it possible that you can be so much of a rampaging hypocrite to accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist on the same afternoon you open up a thread claiming that time is a conspiracy theory?

If I am a crackpot then you are a smashed pot, you insanely dishonest bag of Jews.

Side: Makes sense
FactMachine(387) Disputed
2 points

Insanely dishonest bag of Jews, I'll have to write that one down.

Side: Mini Hitler
-2 points
0 points

You give yourself away immediately as an alt account when you arrive and start randomly attacking people who have not spoken a single word to you. Do our entire species a favour and garrotte yourself with one of your incredibly long pubic hairs you stupid, tantrum-throwing carbon thief.

Side: Makes sense
FactMachine(387) Disputed
2 points

You gave yourself away immediately as having alt accounts when Mathfan has -5 points on his posts in other threads and you just downvoted Nathan with multiple accounts.

Side: Mini Hitler