CreateDebate


Debate Info

11
5
Individual's rights (why). State's rights (why).
Debate Score:16
Arguments:17
Total Votes:17
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Individual's rights (why). (9)
 
 State's rights (why). (5)

Debate Creator

Sitara(11080) pic



Individual's rights versus state's rights: which one is more important?

I am for the individual's rights over the state's rights, because everyone has natural rights.

Individual's rights (why).

Side Score: 11
VS.

State's rights (why).

Side Score: 5
2 points

For me it is individual rights over state, the reason is state rights are pretty much "the majority rule by paying off the right people", lets take of gay & civil rights, to this day many states still try to block gays from equality, in the 1960's states where the ones trying to keep blacks from having there constitutional rights, if it wasn't for the Federal government stepping in we to this day might still have blacks sitting on the back of the bus in some state.

State and federal rights should be to protect individual rights, but that isn't the case, state rights are to protect corporations that want to bend the rules in order to maximize profits, like allowing chemical companies to spill waste in local streams and river beds.

Another prime example is with state rights religious institutions will have there way, prayer in public schools, the teaching of creation in public school and so on, state rights is a lie, it is nothing more then a public auction up for bidding by any corporate interest or religious cult, state rights are the prostitutes of America.

Side: Individual's rights (why).
1 point

thank you. I like the way that you described that. :)

Side: Individual's rights (why).
2 points

Despite how much I hate right wingers as people and religious fundies, I have to say that personal rights are more important. I believe dictators can rule well, and even better than democracies. However those dictators are few and far because real leaders in humans are few and far. Most humans seem not to have it in them.

.

A Wise man said a person is smart, but People are dumb. The end should read a person is good or evil, people don't give a damn enough to qualify. I'd rather have dumb and apathetic at the wheel than Smart and selfish evil.

Side: Individual's rights (why).
1 point

You can be a liberal and support individual rights. I do. :)

Side: Individual's rights (why).
ActiveGray(39) Clarified
1 point

Oh I know. But supporting individual rights means I have to hear them talk and can't just give them a go to jail free card.

Side: Individual's rights (why).

I am for the rights of the individual because Government should not dictate to us on how to lead our lives.

Side: Individual's rights (why).
Del1176(4975) Banned
1 point

Ultimately they were the people the 'individuals' outside of the state's leadership voted to lead us and to have more rights than us in making decisions.

To then say they shouldn't have more rights than the individual is to be a hypocrite of the finest order.

Side: State's rights (why).
Sitara(11080) Disputed
1 point

The states are made up of individuals. Without the individual, the state would not exist.

Side: Individual's rights (why).
Del1176(4975) Disputed Banned
1 point

By individual you are blatantly referring to those not in power thus, for debate's sake, you have eliminated the individuals in the 'State' from being included in the term 'individual'.

Side: State's rights (why).

Individuals don't get rights, because that is just SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaavage

Side: State's rights (why).