CreateDebate


Debate Info

15
24

Bruce Lunsford (D)


Mitch McConnell (R)

Debate Score:39
Arguments:23
Total Votes:46
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 
Bruce Lunsford (D)
(9)
 
 
Mitch McConnell (R)
(14)

Debate Creator

CreateDebate(732) pic



Who should I vote for in the 2008 Kentucky Senate Race?


Bruce Lunsford (D)

Side Score: 15
VS.


Mitch McConnell (R)

Side Score: 24
3 points

It might not help Senator McConnell's cause to be a McCain supporter rather than remaining neutral like his fellow senator, Jim Bunning. Lunsford might be able to present a case for bipartisanship by citing his endorsement of former governor Ernie Fletcher while carefully avoiding any mention of the legal trouble that got him voted out of office.

Side:
Bruce Lunsford (D)
2 points

The Senate race between Dem. Bruce Lunsford and Rep. Mitch McConnell has been focused primarily on the energy crisis and the increasing gas prices that are affecting the Kentucky economy.

Lunsford offers Kentucky voters an "8 point plan for energy independence" with which he is committed "to lowering gas prices, reducing America’s dependence on foreign oil, strengthening our national security, and boosting Kentucky’s economy."

The eight points include:

1. Opening up the Strategic Petroleum Reserve

2. Closing the "Enron Loophole" that will discourage speculative investments and the excessive buyouts on future contracts.

3. A Gas Tax Holiday

4. Protecting customers from price gouging by oil companies and vendors.

5. Requiring that oil companies drill only on currently leased land rather than pushing for new, offshore drilling options.

6. Tapping into the oil shale supplies in Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming.

7. Promoting the Kentucky clean coal industry as a viable alternative in American's clean energy plan.

8. Moving towards alternative and renewable energy sources.

Supporting Evidence: 8 point energy plan (bruce2008.com)
Side: The 8 Point Energy Plan
1 point

The outcome of this election will hinge on the Iraq war. Despite his consistently conservative voting history in the Kentucky senate, and his position as Minority Leader, McConnell is vulnerable because of his support of the Iraq war. The outcome of the 2006 midterms in favor of the Democrats indicated a shift in the public's opinion of the war. McConnell is not likely to benefit from his remaining an advocate for the U.S. presence in Iraq.

Given Kentucky's potential to become a purple state, Lunsford has the advantage as a "change" candidate. Lunsford also received an important endorsement this week, from Rep. Ben Chandler, his opponent in 2003 Kentucky gubernatorial primary.

Side: McConnell and Iraq
1 point

I agree wholeheartedly with this opinion. Mr. Lunsford is the candidate of change. While McConnell has done his fair share for Kentucky, he has become part of the "Washington scene" and is no longer all about Kentucky and its improvement. In any situation, change is necessary for growth. And Kentucky's growth has been stagnant long enough.

Side: Bruce Lunsford
1 point

Bruce Lunsford (D) and Mitch McConnell (R) have agreed to debate this coming Saturday (September 13th) in northern Kentucky at 8:30AM in the Receptions Banquet and Conference Center in Erlanger.

Lunsford has accepted offers for seven additional debates and has extended the challenge to McConnell who (as of yet) has not responded.

Supporting Evidence: Debate (www.courier-journal.com)
Side: Debate
1 point

Hillary Clinton is coming to town to campaign with and for Bruce Lunsford. They have two stops planned for this weekend together.

Side: Bruce Lunsford
0 points

Bruce Lunsford has been attacking McConnell on the same old spots that Democrats across the nation have been attacking their Republican challengers.

According to John David Dyche of The Courier Journal, perhaps the best chance Lunsford has in defeating the Republican incumbent in a largely conservative state is to quit pushing an energy agenda; stop tying McConnell to big money and corporate fat cats; and start distancing himself from the "national Democrat" label by adopting some of the foreign, fiscal, and immigration policy arguments of the likes of Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan.

It's an interesting thought project (to say the least), when we consider the more traditionally conservative voting base in some of the Southern and Midwest states. Should a Democratic challenger take a more Libertarian angle (albeit a very appealing angle to disenfranchised Republicans) to gain the votes necessary to defeat their Republican rivals who find themselves identified with a costly war, poor management of federal funds, and a lengthy, unnecessary delay in dealing with our immigration problems?

Supporting Evidence: Thought Project (www.courier-journal.com)
Side: Though Project
0 points

Sen. Hillary Clinton stopped in at the Kentucky Horse Farm in Lexington this Saturday to offer a much-appreciated boost to Lunsford's campaign.

Clinton carried up to 65% (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/ky/kentucky_democratic_primary-638.html) of the state's Democratic votes in the Primary Season. Lunsford has to be grateful for the Senator's appearance on his behalf as her presence on the campaign trail will help to solidify a crucial Democratic base in the state and (he hopes) will pull a valuable percentage of independent votes come November.

The Senator took the opportunity to attack Lunsford's Republican rival, Mitch McConnell, whom she claimed has "aided and abetted" through the eight years of failed policies under the Bush Administration.

Supporting Evidence: Much Needed Help (www.lex18.com)
Side: Much Needed Help
4 points

Democrats would be wise to look for warnings that they are perpetuating a cycle of election losses from past losses. Lunsford was just recently endorsed by 2003 gubernatorial candidate Ben Chandler, who lost to Ernie Fletcher and has endorsed Obama's presidential campaign. Even within the Democratic party, Senator Clinton easily won Kentucky's primary.

Side:
Mitch McConnell (R)
2 points

“Every expert in America tells us that Americans will be dependent on fossil-fuels for decades to come. And until the day when we’re all plugging in our cars or using alternative fuels, Americans can’t be expected to shoulder the crushing burden of ever increasing gas prices. Congress has a responsibility to act, and that action must involve a comprehensive approach."

Mitch McConnell in a statement from the Senate floor.

Mitch McConnell is an ardent supporter of offshore drilling and accuses the Democratic Party of hindering legislation that would allow for lower gas prices at the pump and quicken the day when we finally end our dependence on oil and fossil fuels by politicizing the clean energy issue leading up to the Presidential Election in November.

McConnell is pressing for solutions to be made before the election, not after, and that the primary cause of the rise in oil prices is the increasing demand and static supply. This cause, he argues, can be remedied sooner by tapping into our offshore sources for oil, which will lower prices and boost the economy, and begin an increase of our investments in alternative energy resources.

Supporting Evidence: McConnell on Energy (mcconnell.senate.gov)
Side: McConnel on Energy
2 points

Lunsford lacks credibility when it comes to winning elections on a federal level. He's run for governor twice and couldn't even make it through his party's primaries. This results in voters not having enough information to work with when it comes to his stances. McConnell has not only served more than 20 years as a senator but is also in good standing with conservatives and has moved up to prominent roles. We are familiar with his stances. However, during this cycle, he will have to distance himself from his close ties to the Bush administration.

Side:
Mitch McConnell (R)
BigIron(477) Disputed
0 points

Mitch McConnell is suffering a notable decline in approval ratings since the spring. In May, McConnell was sitting on a 57% SurveyUSA poll but is now looking at a 44% approval rating according the most recent poll (the poll has a 4.6 point margin of error.)

While the McConnell campaign has yet to issue a statement regarding the poll's results, Lunsford has jumped at the chance to point out the decline to potential voters.

According to Cary Stemle, a Lunsford spokesman, "This poll is further evidence that Kentuckians are ready for a change. As they learn more about his 24-year voting record in Washington, Kentuckians realize that McConnell is part of the problem, and it's time for a change."

Supporting Evidence: Sliding down approval (news.cincinnati.com)
Side: Sliding down approval
2 points

Mitch McConnell is a true conservative. That is good news for the 60% of Americans who claim to be conservative according to the latest Battle Ground poll. In 2007, the American Conservative Union gave McConnell a score of 92 which makes him one of the most loyal conservatives in the Senate.

McConnell is firm on Republican stances such as being for offshore drilling, smaller government, and the privatization of social security. He is also pro-life and anti-gay marriage.

At a time when liberals may not only have the majority in the House and Senate, but may also claim the White House, a traditionalist is needed, if only as a check and balance.

Supporting Evidence: McConnell on the Issues (www.ourcampaigns.com)
Side: McConnel on Energy
1 point

As far as the "checks and balances" goes, I'd probably agree. However, I can't necessarily say that I agree that "liberals" per se have taken the majority of the House and Senate but rather that Democrats have (I don't consider "liberal" and "Democrat" to mean the same thing.)

As far as McConnell, his ability to express disapproval with regard to the war in Iraq has to come as a refreshment to those who tend to call themselves "true conservatives" (and by "true conservatives", I'm referring to those who have strong disagreements with the extension of the Executive Branch to perhaps the most powerful it's ever been, the wasteful spending, the imbalance of the national budget, and our failed spending and policies overseas.)

I think it's necessary to have the balance you refer to on Capital Hill and I hope we can achieve something that even resembles a balance after nearly 7 years of a completely lopsided Congress and White House.

Supporting Evidence: Aye to Checks and Balances (www.cnn.com)
Side: Aye to Checks and Balances
1 point

This week the AFL-CIO is amping up its attack against the economic positions of Mitch McConnell (R) by claiming that the Republican Senator "“stands with lobbyists, not with us" (and by "us" they are referring to organized labor in the state of Kentucky.)

They cited McConnell's votes against the Employee Free Choice Act and argued that he "takes millions from special interests” by pointing to contributions he received from energy companies to fund his campaign.

The attacks were proliferated in a canvassing effort via 32,000 mailers placed in mailboxes across the state with the statement:

"On the issues that matter most to Kentucky families, Mitch McConnell makes all the wrong choices."

According to a spokesperson for the AFL-CIO, the effort will continue through more mailers and phone banking until the day of the election.

Supporting Evidence: AFL CIO canvas (politickerky.com)
Side: AFL CIO canvas
2 points

Mitch Mitchell (R) has recently been praised by the Coalition to Protect Senior Care (CPSC) for helping to stop a legislative effort by the Bush Administration to pass a bill which would have cut federal funding for nursing homes in Kentucky by up to $4 billion over the next five years, $770 for the fiscal year of 2009.

Mitchell was instrumental in drumming up opposition to the proposal, which was manifested in a letter written to Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt. The letter warned that the proposal would "jeopardize the significant quality improvements made by the skilled nursing facility (SNF) community in recent years as well as the ability of nursing homes to continue caring for high acuity patients. Because nursing homes rely on Medicare to make up for chronic underfunding by the Medicaid program - an average of $13 per day for every Medicaid beneficiary in nursing homes nationwide - it is critically important that Medicare reimbursement remain fair and consistent. We believe that if the Administration were to finalize its proposed rule, the ability of providers to care for our nation's most vulnerable population - the frail elderly and disabled - would be severely threatened."

Supporting Evidence: On Behalf of the Elderly (www.marketwatch.com)
Side: On behalf of the Elderly
2 points

McConnell has such a large fund raising edge that he has kicked 100K from his coffers upstairs to the National Republican Senatorial Committee where it will be allocated to other races deemed more in doubt.

Side: Mitch McConnell
2 points

I have liked the job Mitch McConnell has done for Kentucky. I am also a conservative, and hold the same beliefs on the issues Mitch has. I think a lot of the problems we have today are due to the Democratic control House and Senate. We need less government and lower taxes to help stimuate the economy and Mitch understands this.

Side: Mitch McConnell
2 points

As a Kentuckian, I consider it a privilege to have Mitch McConnell representing me in the United States Senate. He is a true patriot who fights to get results for our Commonwealth every single day.

Of course, every politician claims to “fight every day” for their constituents, however, I have always been of the belief that actions speak louder than words. If you keep up at all with all the happenings in Washington, it isn’t hard to see how effective Senator McConnell is. Whether it is a reliable news source reporting actual facts or one of our state’s two major newspapers trying to hide his efforts behind the power of the pen, in reality, it is not hard to see just how much good Senator McConnell does for Kentucky everyday.

ALSO- I cannot fail to mention what a true honor it is to have a Kentuckian serving as the leader of one of the two major parties in the U.S. Senate. Senator McConnell is a true statesman who has always worked hard and that is why he was selected by his colleagues to serve in this post. I know that Kentuckians realize how impressive this is and understand how beneficial it is to have our senior Senator in such a prestigious position.

Side: Mitch McConnell
1 point

McConnell (R) has released a new ad attacking Bruce Lunsford's (D) ties to a company associated with a veteran's health care clinic that offered "deficient care" to it's patients.

The ad claims that through Valor healthcare, for whom Lunsford served as CEO, the Democratic candidate "got rich the Wall Street way."

The Lunsford campaign has yet to respond to the ad saying that when the time is right they will offer a "vigorous" response. Inevitably, the Democratic candidate will have to as an aggressive smear campaign like this one launched by a GOP ticket has a proven track record of being highly effective once the votes come in.

Lunsford's best bet at this point may be to do whatever it takes to tie McConnell as close to Bush's fiscal policies as possible with whatever opportunity he gets between now and the first week of November.

McConnell's New ad
Side: McConnell's new ad
1 point

McConnell Votes for Bailout

What a difference two days make. While many in the House appeared to buckle under constituent pressure not to pass a bailout bill, voters now are expressing their concerns about future borrowing and are warming up to a bailout. McConnell voted for the bill to prevent the further spread of the crisis.

After his vote, he told the stories of a few of his constituents voicing their concerns,

“Small business owners in Kentucky are writing urgent letters to my office saying that their interest rates are already skyrocketing and putting their businesses — and employees’ jobs — at risk.

“A woman in Central Kentucky wrote that she’s afraid she’ll have to sell off part of her family’s farm.

“A retired school counselor wrote to say she can’t afford to see her small retirement savings vanish.

“A small business owner in La Grange told me he’s worried about the effect on his business and his employees because, in just the past week, the interest rate on the loan he took out to finance his office building more than tripled.

“The current crisis may have its roots in the actions of a few. But its effects could potentially reach into every single home in Kentucky, and every other home in America."

Supporting Evidence: Yes to Bailout (mcconnell.senate.gov)
Side: Bailout
1 point

Senator McConnell will need to be ready to explain his vote for the revised Wall Street bailout bill even if this doesn't put him in danger of losing his seat. There's also no telling what Lunsford would have done if he were in office right now; we can only speculate and any claims he makes are basically empty. The bill has yet to pass and McConnell is the one with the most responsibility toward his constituents for what happens.

Side:
Mitch McConnell (R)
1 point

Despite the near disappearance of his lead in the polls and despite the obstacles that the economic crisis has posed to his and any other incumbent Senator in the nation, Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell is aggressively responding to his rival's, Democrat Bruce Lunsford, attempts to play the market meltdown to his favor.

In retaliation to the Democrat's negative ads claiming McConnell received campaign contributions from big corporations and Wall Street firms and criticizing his vote in support of the bailout, Mitch McConnell defended his vote arguing that the bailout "isn't about a bailout of Wall Street, it's a buy-in, so can turn our economy around."

He then turned the issue on Lunsford via his campaign manager, Justin Brasell, "It is the height of arrogance for someone who has made a fortune playing the Wall Street game to now say that he does not like the system. Worse yet is that Bruce can’t even offer an opinion about how we should work to help Kentucky’s families navigate these difficult times.”

Lunsford has yet to say how he would have voted with regards to the bailout.

Supporting Evidence: McConnell Offensive (www.newsandtribune.com)
Side: McConnell Offensive