CreateDebate


What is this?

This is a collection of graphs and information about the debate. For clarity, only the top three positions (tags) are presented in graphs.

Language Grade Level uses the Flesh-Kincaid Readability Grade Level formula.

Debate Statistics for Do you see how enabling corruption or womanizing in the past, you can no longer judge it?
view debate

Side scores:
 
Do you see how enabling corruption or womanizing in the past, you can no longer judge it? : 5

Total arguments:
 
Do you see how enabling corruption or womanizing in the past, you can no longer judge it? : 2

Word lengths:
 
Do you see how enabling corruption or womanizing in the past, you can no longer judge it? : 4.73 ave



Language grade level:
Flesh-Kincaid Readability Grade Level
 
Do you see how enabling corruption or womanizing in the past, you can no longer judge it? : 9th

Vocabulary overlap:
 
Do you see how enabling corruption or womanizing in the past, you can no longer judge it?

Total words used:
 
Do you see how enabling corruption or womanizing in the past, you can no longer judge it? : 96



Word frequencies:
able  actions  alive  any  away  because  being  blacks  burn  cometolight  comments  deplorable  desperately  enabling  even  excuse  finger  foaming  gleefully  grabbing  he's  hillary  ironically  lessen  mouth  obama  on1mexicans2women3  person  point  privates  recent  selfentitled  side  starby  things  tries  trump  trumps  trying  views  wants  whatever  wipe  woman's