All true. If a person is suicidal, a gun increases their chances of follow through. The vast majority of people are not suicidal, in which case a gun has no impact on suicidality. The presence of a father decreases the likelihood that such emotional disturbances will arise.
The likelihood of the event absolutely has to do with how many people have an event occur vs how many do not. Suicide is highly unlikely. For people who do not suffer suicidal ideation, the likelihood is zero, even if there's a gun in the home.
Your hoplophobia causes you to put a high degree of agency in inanimate objects.
"When did you stop hitting your wife" is an example of plurium interrogationum, or complex question. "The presupposition is a proposition that is presumed to be acceptable to the respondent when the question is asked."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Your example is literally included as an example on the source page.
The numbers aren't hard to search. Poverty doesn't paint a very strong argument for you because the numbers are close, even where women are higher than men. But I'm talking about being destitute, not poor.
"In 2020, about 69.6 percent of the estimated number of homeless individuals in the United States were male."
https://www.statista.com/statistics/
To pretend humans aren't the result of natural and sexual selection is anti-science. Humans are estimated to have existed for 6 million years. Civilization and agriculture has only been around for 10 thousand years.
The differences between men and women are small (though important) on average. But females tend to cluster more around the average than males, making the bell curve taller in the middle for women and longer at the tails for men. That explanation may be confusing unless you're familiar with the Greater Male Variation Hypothesis, which you can look up if you're curious.
As for your perception of media, that's merely a statement of your perception.
